Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which function should we use to sort the array in natural order?

Which function should we use to sort the array in natural order? Correct Answer natcasesort()

The function natcasesort() in PHP sorts an array by using a “natural order” algorithm. All the values keep their original keys. Eg: In a natural algorithm, as the number 2 is less than the number 10. But in computer sorting, 10 is less than 2, because the first number in “10” is less than 2. The function is case-insensitive.

Related Questions

A teacher asked the class to subtract 5 from 75.70% of the class said: 25. Their work was shown as: \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 7&5 \end{array}}\\ {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\ { - 5} \ \ \ &{} \end{array}} }\\ {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2&5 \end{array}} } \end{array}\) Which of the following describes the most appropriate remedial action that the teacher should take to clarify this misconception?
The given array is arr = {1, 2, 4, 3}. Bubble sort is used to sort the array elements. How many passes will be done to sort the array?
A class III mathematics teacher gave the following questions to her students:  \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 256 \\ + 173 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 28 \\ + 32 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 129 \\ + 76 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) Later she asks the students to solve a worksheet that has similar questions. Which of the following statements is appropriate for the given situation?
A material is loaded elastically under plane stress condition given by the following tensor:
\[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1 \\ 0 \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2 \\ 1 \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 \\ 0 \end{array}} \right
The usual O(n2) implementation of insertion sort to sort an array uses linear search to identify the position where an element is to be inserted into the already sorted part of the array. If, instead, we use binary search to identify the position, the worst case running time will
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct w.r.t 'C' language? (i) A part of the array can be passed to the function instead of the whole array. (ii) Numeric array elements cannot be assigned initial values if the array is defined as a pointer variable.
Why is insertion sort preferred over other sorting algorithms (like selection sort, bubble sort etc.) for Tim sort implementation?
Consider the Quick sort algorithm in which the partitioning procedure splits elements into two sub-arrays and each sub-array contains at least one-fourth of the elements. Let T(n) be the number of comparisons required to sort array of n elements. Then T(n)<=?
Given is a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Statement: Sustainability can be defined as the practice of meeting the needs of the current generation without degrading or destroying the natural resources (e.g. water, soil, biodiversity, oil, minerals.) Assumptions: Our lives and economies are dependent on natural capital, which is made up of these natural resources and natural services, and the energy provided by the sun. Just as every investor knows, we should invest our capital and live off on the interest, it provides. To live sustainably, we need to do the same: protect our natural capital and live off our biological income.
Consider the following two C code segment. Y and X are one- and two-dimensional arrays of size n and n × n respectively, where 2 ≤ n ≤ 10. Assume that in both code segments, elements of y are initialized to 0 and each element X[i] [j] of array X is initialized to i + j. Further assume that when stored in main memory all elements of x are in same main memory page frame. Code segment 1:                 //initialize elements of y to 0                 //initialize elements X[i] [j] of X to i+j                       for (i = 0; i < n; i++)                                 Y[i] += X[0] [i]; Code Segment 2:                 //initialize elements of Y to 0                 //initialize elements X[i] [j] of X to i+j                        for (i = 0; i < n; i++)                                 Y[i] += X[i] [0]; Which of the following statements is/are correct? S1: Final contents of array Y will be same in both code segments S2: Elements of array X accessed inside the for loop shown in code segment 1 are contiguous in main memory S3: Elements of array X accessed inside the for loop shown in code segment 2 are contiguous in main memory