Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements 1. All managers are employees. 2. All seniors are managers. 3. Some seniors are pensioners. Conclusions: I. Some pensioners are employees. Il. Some managers are pensioners. III. All employees are seniors.

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements 1. All managers are employees. 2. All seniors are managers. 3. Some seniors are pensioners. Conclusions: I. Some pensioners are employees. Il. Some managers are pensioners. III. All employees are seniors. Correct Answer Only conclusions I and II follow

The least possible diagram is as follows[ src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/03/F1_Savita%20SSC__21-3-22_D1%20%2814%29.png" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; width: 149px; height: 175px;">

Conclusions: 

I. Some pensioners are employees → True (as, some seniors are pensioners and all seniors are employees, so part of seniors that are employees are pensioners too)

Il. Some managers are pensioners → True (as, some seniors are pensioners and all seniors are managers, so part of seniors that are managers are pensioners too)

III. All employees are seniors → False (it is possible but not definite as shown in the figure above)

Hence, only conclusions I and II follow.

Related Questions

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statement. Statements: 1. All judges are lawyers. 2. Some lawyers are seniors. Conclusions: I. Some seniors are judges. II. Some seniors are lawyers. III. Some lawyers are judges. IV. Some judges are seniors. 
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. After a Pay Commission bonanza of 2% hike in dearness allowance in March, central government employees and pensioners can expect another round of salary increase with the government set to modify the index and base year for calculating dearness allowance.  II. The labour ministry is working on a new series of consumer price index for industrial workers (CPI-IW), which is used to determine dearness allowance (DA).  Conclusions: I. DA is a cost of living adjustment allowance paid to government employees, public sector employees and pensioners in the country. It is calculated as a percentage of an employee’s basic salary to mitigate the impact of inflation on people.  II. Since theindex is used to determine dearness allowance of all government employees and industrial workers there may be significant financial implication. III. The trend so far is that the weightage of transport, healthcare and housing has gone up many fold in the new series in the monthly expenditure of an industrial worker, especially consumption of petrol and diesel with the addition of cars to it, while there is decline in overall food basket which is being diversified.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All uncles are relatives. 2. Some relatives are neighbours. 3. All neighbours are employed. Conclusions: I. Some neighbours are uncles. II. Some uncles are employed. III. Some relatives are employed.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, Il and Ill. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All watches are clocks. 2. Some clocks are machines. 3. Some machines are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some watches are machines. Il. Some machines are clocks. Ill. Some gadgets being clocks is a possibility.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real - world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.  Statements :  1. All towns are cities.  2. No city is a village.  3. Some cities are corporations.  Conclusions :  I. Some corporations are villages.  II. Some towns are corporations.  III. No corporation is a village.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All buildings are shops. 2. Some shops are boutiques. 3. No restaurant is a boutique. Conclusions: I. Some boutiques are buildings. II. Some restaurants being buildings is a possibility. III. No restaurant is a shop.
Two statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All knives are instruments. Some cutters are knives. Conclusions: I. Some cutters are instruments. II. All knives are cutters. III. Some knives are not instruments.
Two statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows from the statements. Statements: All ponds are pools. Some wells are ponds. Conclusions: I. Some ponds are not wells. II. Some wells are pools. III. All pools are wells.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. No cup is a plate. 2. All plates are cutleries. 3. No cutlery is a spoon. Conclusions: I. Some cutleries are plates. II. No cutlery is a cup. III. Some spoons being cups is a possibility
Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some managers are bosses. Some doctors are managers. Conclusions: I. Some managers are executives. II. Some doctors are bosses.