Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Two statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All knives are instruments. Some cutters are knives. Conclusions: I. Some cutters are instruments. II. All knives are cutters. III. Some knives are not instruments.

Two statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All knives are instruments. Some cutters are knives. Conclusions: I. Some cutters are instruments. II. All knives are cutters. III. Some knives are not instruments. Correct Answer Only conclusion I follows

[ alt="SSC CGL 2018 7th June shift 10 AM 15" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/09/SSC_CGL_2018_7th_June_shift_10_AM_%2015.png" style="width: 203px; height: 100px;">

I. Some cutters are instruments → True.

II. All knives are cutters → False (It is possible but not definite)

III. Some knives are not instruments → False.

Hence, only conclusion I follows.

Related Questions

Four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, Il and III. You have to assume the given statements to be true even if they seem to be deviate from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some plates are knives All knives are chains. Some chains are wheels. All wheels are poles. Conclusions: I. Some poles are chains. II. Some Wheels are knives III. Some chains are plates
Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. Some phones are instruments. 2. All instruments are devices Conclusions: I. All devices are instruments. Il. Some devices are phones.
Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. Some instruments are machines. 2. All instruments are gadgets. Conclusions: I. No machine is a gadget. II. Some machines are gadgets.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All uncles are relatives. 2. Some relatives are neighbours. 3. All neighbours are employed. Conclusions: I. Some neighbours are uncles. II. Some uncles are employed. III. Some relatives are employed.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, Il and Ill. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All watches are clocks. 2. Some clocks are machines. 3. Some machines are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some watches are machines. Il. Some machines are clocks. Ill. Some gadgets being clocks is a possibility.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements 1. All managers are employees. 2. All seniors are managers. 3. Some seniors are pensioners. Conclusions: I. Some pensioners are employees. Il. Some managers are pensioners. III. All employees are seniors.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real - world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.  Statements :  1. All towns are cities.  2. No city is a village.  3. Some cities are corporations.  Conclusions :  I. Some corporations are villages.  II. Some towns are corporations.  III. No corporation is a village.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All buildings are shops. 2. Some shops are boutiques. 3. No restaurant is a boutique. Conclusions: I. Some boutiques are buildings. II. Some restaurants being buildings is a possibility. III. No restaurant is a shop.
Two statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows from the statements. Statements: All ponds are pools. Some wells are ponds. Conclusions: I. Some ponds are not wells. II. Some wells are pools. III. All pools are wells.
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows(s) from the statements. Statements: All computers are instruments. Some machines are computers. Conclusion: I All instruments are computers. II Some machines are instruments. III Some instruments are machines.