Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

From among the following statements regarding Munshi Premchand and his works, which of them are correct? (A) Premchand was among the first to portray the Dalits as independent and recognizable characters both as part of the poor and with their own particular problems (B) Premchand was extremely insensitive to the political and social movements of his times (C) Premchand was concerned both about social evils and enslaved conditions of his country (D) One of his (Premchand's) last and most famous stories, Kafan (the Shroud), was first published in Hindi in 1935 and later appeared in Urdu Choose the correct answer from the option given below:

From among the following statements regarding Munshi Premchand and his works, which of them are correct? (A) Premchand was among the first to portray the Dalits as independent and recognizable characters both as part of the poor and with their own particular problems (B) Premchand was extremely insensitive to the political and social movements of his times (C) Premchand was concerned both about social evils and enslaved conditions of his country (D) One of his (Premchand's) last and most famous stories, Kafan (the Shroud), was first published in Hindi in 1935 and later appeared in Urdu Choose the correct answer from the option given below: Correct Answer (A) and (C) only

Among the following statements regarding Munshi Premchand and his works, only (A) and (C) are correct.

Important Points

  • Munshi Premchand was born on July 31, 1880, in the village of Lamhi, Uttar Pradesh.
  • Premchand was concerned both about social evils and enslaved conditions of the country.
  • He has presented the realistic picture of poverty and social evils with which people were struggling hard during the pre-independence period.
  • Through his stories and novels, he has tried to create awareness about the exploitation and suffering of society, by selecting the people from different strata of society including the Dalits.
  • His novel 'Kayakalp' was a study of a society torn apart by communal tension, injustice and exploitation.
  • He depicted the reality which he saw around him as he was extremely sensitive to the political and social movements of his times and it is also reflected in his literary works.
  • Premchand also wrote on the problems of untouchability along with other subjects in his writings.
  • Premchand was among the first to portray the Dalits as independent and recognizable characters both as part of the poor and with their own particular problems.
  • He is identified as the first Hindu and Urdu writer who has taken up the Dalit question as part of an explicit political agenda.

  • One of the Premchand's last and most famous stories, Kafan (the Shroud), was first published in Urdu in 1935 and later appeared in Hindi in 1936 and thus reflected his syncretic personality.

Thus, we can conclude that  the following statements regarding Munshi Premchand and his works are correct:

(A) Premchand was among the first to portray the Dalits as independent and recognizable characters both as part of the poor and with their own particular problems.

(C) Premchand was concerned both about social evils and enslaved conditions of his country.

Related Questions

Which of the following statements are correct? (a) Premchand was among the first to portray the Dalits as independent and recognizable characters, both as part of the poor and with their own particular problems (b) Premchand's literary works do not reflect political and social movements of his times (c) Premchand's novels reflect a surrender to ideologies of traditional Hindu religion (d) One of the Premchand's last and most famous stories 'Kafan' was first published in Urdu in 1935 and later appeared in Hindi in 1936. and thus reflect his syncretic personality Choose the correct option:
Ratio of number of novels published by a writer in Hindi to Urdu is 25 : 16 and ratio of number of novels published by him in Urdu to English is 8 : 11. If the difference between number of novels published in Hindi and English is 27, then what is the total novels published by writer?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?
Employees of a company can speak three languages, 40% can speak Hindi, 15% can speak both Hindi and English, 10% can speak all the three languages. If 15% can speak only Hindi and 20% can speak only Urdu, then what percent of total employees can speak only Hindi or Urdu or both?
Simplify the value of $$\frac{{{\text{0}}{\text{.9}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.9}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.9 + 0}}{\text{.2}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.2}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.2 + 0}}{\text{.3}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.3}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.3}} - {\text{3}} \times 0.9 \times {\text{0}}{\text{.2}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.3}}}}{{{\text{0}}{\text{.9}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.9 + 0}}{\text{.2}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.2 + 0}}{\text{.3}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.3}} - 0.9 \times {\text{0}}{\text{.2}} - {\text{0}}{\text{.2}} \times {\text{0}}{\text{.3}} - 0.3 \times 0.9}} = ?$$
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? The writer was working at a university in which country?
There is a hint in this question and a statement is given later. Carefully read the excerpts provided and determine the statement based on that episode. The current Australian team has lost three of their last five Test series. They lost their last two Test series, one of which was against Pakistan, which is not considered to be a strong team now. Australia's two best batsman, Steve Smith and David Warner are currently suspended and their absence has weakened the Australian team. There is a lot of dissatisfaction and introspection about how their national team plays in Australia, how they show aggression on the field, how they do not show respect to the team against them, and neglecting the media at the most, and focusing only on winning only, the discussion on the future of the game is ongoing. There are. Australian cricket never reached such a low level. This is the best opportunity to knock them into their own house. In other words, if this India could not beat Australia in Australia in this series, then it would prove that the campaign around this team is only the same: the propaganda. Legislation: The current Australian team won two of the last five Tests they played. Choose the right one from the next option A - The statement is completely true. B - Statement is most true. C - There is no definitive definition based on C-statement. D- Statement is completely false.
In this question, a statement is given followed by four conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statement: In the university examination, most of the candidates take exam in Hindi medium. Conclusions: I. Some candidates take exam in Hindi. II. Most of the candidates appeared for the examination are from Hindi medium. III. In this examination no candidate writes answers in medium other than Hindi. IV. All the candidates who appear in this examination write answers in Hindi.
$$\frac{{38 \times 38 \times 38 + 34 \times 34 \times 34 + 28 \times 28 \times 28 - 38 \times 34 \times 84}}{{38 \times 38 + 34 \times 34 + 28 \times 28 - 38 \times 34 - 34 \times 28 - 38 \times 28}}$$            is equal to = ?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? What wrong with respect to India are the Europeans responsible for?