Consider the following statements with reference to Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR): 1. CRR is the fraction of the total Net Demand and Time Liabilities maintained by bank with itself in form of cash deposits. 2. SLR is the fraction of the total Net Demand and Time Liabilities maintained by bank with RBI in form of specified liquid assets. 3. CRR and SLR are part of Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF). Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Consider the following statements with reference to Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR): 1. CRR is the fraction of the total Net Demand and Time Liabilities maintained by bank with itself in form of cash deposits. 2. SLR is the fraction of the total Net Demand and Time Liabilities maintained by bank with RBI in form of specified liquid assets. 3. CRR and SLR are part of Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF). Which of the statements given above is/are correct? Correct Answer None of the above

Cash Reserve Ratio refers to the fraction of the total Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL) of a Scheduled Commercial Bank held in India, that it has to maintain as cash deposit with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Hence statement 1 is wrong.

The Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) is a prudential measure under which all Scheduled Commercial Banks in India must maintain an amount in one of the following forms as a percentage of their total Demand and Time Liabilities (DTL) / Net DTL (NDTL); Cash; Gold; Or Investments in un-encumbered Instruments. In contrast to the CRR, under which banks have to maintain cash with the RBI, the SLR requires holding of assets in one of the above three categories by the bank itself. Thus statement 2 is wrong too.

Liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) is a monetary policy tool which allows banks to borrow money through repurchase agreements or repos. LAF is used to aid banks in adjusting the day to day mismatches in liquidity (frictional liquidity deficit/surplus). Both SLR and CRR are not part of Liquidity adjustment facility. Hence statement 3 is wrong too.

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: In a bid to find a successor to founder CEO Rana Kapoor, The Yes Bank has formed a five member panel including two members from outside the bank, less than a week after Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cut short his tenure until January 31 2019. In a press release sent to the exchanges late on Tuesday evening, Yes Bank said that the “search and selection committee” would comprise of three members of the bank’s nomination and remuneration committee and also two external members, which the bank did not specify.  Courses of action: I. However, the board has requested the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to grant an extension to Kapoor up to September 2019 ‘for finalization of audited financial statements for fiscal year ending March 2019 and in order for the statutory AGM process to be completed’. II. The board has also recommended the elevation of senior group presidents Rajat Monga and Pralay Mondal as executive directors ‘to ensure a long term succession plan within Yes Bank, and given the demonstrated track record of these two senior leaders’. All this will be subject to RBI approval.  III. The panel will comprise of five members and will focus on find a successor to Rana Kapoor.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments, is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: Over the past five decades, term deposits in banks have emerged as the primary instrument of financial savings for the average Indian after former premier Indira Gandhi embarked on a mission to nationalise the lenders - 14 in the first tranche - on a rainy afternoon in July 1969. Coming with an unsaid sovereign guarantee of sorts, fixed deposits (FDs) seemingly offered investors liquidity - and safety - as nationalisation sought, in part, to arrest the 40-odd bank failures a year.  Now, however, deposits must burnish their allure to retain leadership status in an increasingly crowded financial marketplace that offers choice. Why? Arguments: I. If FDs are giving 7.5% and the effective tax rate is 10%, one gets close to 5-5.2% return. Similarly, in the case of FMP, if the rate is 7.5%, effective taxation comes to 10%, one gets 6.75%. It is higher than the effective returns on bank deposits.  II. People are becoming aware of more asset classes that offer better returns, and the quest for such assets became more pronounced after interest rates fell substantially over the past four years.  III. Savers are looking at mutual funds and provident funds for the higher return.