Statement: The US Department of Justice has launched a criminal probe into whether traders are manipulating the price of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, according to reports.  Which of the following objection(s) may not be a probable reason(s) for the above-taken step by the US Department of Justice to launch the probe? I. Cryptocurrencies should be banned as they are not legal and cannot be afforded by everyone. II. The probe focuses on illegal practices such as spoofing or flooding the market with fake orders to trick other traders into buying or selling.  III. US Department conducts regular probes and it is not something big. IV. The probe focuses on identifying the cryptocurrencies and launch them into the market so that market is not affected.

Statement: The US Department of Justice has launched a criminal probe into whether traders are manipulating the price of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, according to reports.  Which of the following objection(s) may not be a probable reason(s) for the above-taken step by the US Department of Justice to launch the probe? I. Cryptocurrencies should be banned as they are not legal and cannot be afforded by everyone. II. The probe focuses on illegal practices such as spoofing or flooding the market with fake orders to trick other traders into buying or selling.  III. US Department conducts regular probes and it is not something big. IV. The probe focuses on identifying the cryptocurrencies and launch them into the market so that market is not affected. Correct Answer <p>Only I, III and IV</p>

The correct answer is option 1, i.e. Only I, III and IV.

The question asks about which of the objectives(s) may not be a probable reason(s) for the above taken step by the US Department of Justice to launch the probe. It can be inferred that the probe has been launched to identify and focus illegal practices which harm the market.

Objective II is the correct reason of the probe and thus, can be eliminated as our answer choice. Objectives I, III and IV are irrelevant and can be marked as an answer choice. Option 1 captures all the irrelevant objectives and is thus, the most suitable answer choice.

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The domestic equity market has become supervolatile  and converted the psychology of every market participant into fear. Greed and fear continue to alternate in the market, like the two sides of a coin. To a seasoned player, there seems to be nothing new as such instances of panic-selling often occur time and again. Why? Arguments: I. Since demonetisation, herd mentality had jacked up financials, banks and NBFC stocks to great heights on the pretext of financial inclusion and formalisation of the economy. This caused the financials gain disproportionate share in Nifty50 at 35 per cent of the free float market capitalisation, which was unheard of in the past.  II. The domestic market seems to be deeply oversold and can rebound on any good news. The Nifty50 has taken long-term support at the three-year trend line, which makes a case for the correction to near its end. III. Investors, therefore, should not panic and sell off shares. Instead they should do the reverse and gather the courage to pump in more money into the market by picking quality stocks or investing in ETFs for more stable returns.