Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The Sunni Waqf Board on Friday urged the Supreme Court not to allow the Centre or the Uttar Pradesh government to take partisan sides in the Ayodhya title suit. The UP government cannot go back on its neutrality, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan told a three-judge bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra. Dhavan was alluding to the fact that the UP government had maintained its silence on the issue during the earlier state regimes. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the statement above?

The Sunni Waqf Board on Friday urged the Supreme Court not to allow the Centre or the Uttar Pradesh government to take partisan sides in the Ayodhya title suit. The UP government cannot go back on its neutrality, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan told a three-judge bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra. Dhavan was alluding to the fact that the UP government had maintained its silence on the issue during the earlier state regimes. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the statement above? Correct Answer None can be inferred.

The correct answer is option 5, i.e. None can be inferred.

Option 1 can be rejected as it deals with the past and the history of the Masjid and no information of any sort regarding it is mentioned in the above statement.

Option 2 can be rejected as we cannot claim with surety that the ‘earlier ruling’ (against which Dhavan has urged) was prejudiced.

Option 3 can be rejected as it is very generic and does not fit the context appropriately and covers many major aspects and is not specific to the present case.

Option 4 can also be discarded as it introduces independent facts and takes back to the case of 2010, regarding which no information has been provided.

Since, all of the statements mentioned are irrelevant with the given context and can be rejected thus, the most appropriate answer is option 5.

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
The government approved the net neutrality which implies that telecom service providers must treat all internet traffic equally, without any regard to the type, origin or destination of the content. Thus, enabling access to the internet as unrestricted and non-discriminatory. Which of the following is the cause of the statement? I: Restriction of net neutrality allows the internet access service provider to block, degrade, slow down or grant speeds to particular content. II: Restriction of net neutrality affects those who depend on the internet. III: Restriction of net neutrality could result in the discrimination against specific services or websites by the internet access service providers.
Pritesh sir want to go to Ayodhya for Ram Mandir inauguration from Delhi. He misses the direct train to Ayodhya which travels at a speed of 100 km/h and also passes through Kanpur. So, He take the Miata train which is from Delhi to Kanpur which is at 120 km, this train runs at a speed of 60 km/h and Riyat train from Kanpur to Ayodhya which is at 180 km, this train runs at a speed of 90 km/h. But, he has to wait for Riyat Train for 1 Hour on the platform. How much delay will be in reaching Ayodhya?
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Pictures can tell a story. Fact 2: All storybooks have pictures. Fact 3: Some storybooks have both words and pictures. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Pictures can tell a story better than words can. II. The stories in storybooks are very simple. III. Some storybooks have both words and pictures. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
In the following question, some part of the sentence may have some errors. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the most appropriate option. If the sentence is free from error, select ‘No Error’. CJI Dipak Misra has written to all high court chief justices, advising (1)/ them to set up a new disposal review mechanism to clear cases (2)/ on priority and reduce the log. Over 27 million cases are pending in various lower courts in the country. (3) No error (4)
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Most stuffed toys are stuffed with beans. Fact 2: There are stuffed bears and stuffed tigers. Fact 3: Some chairs are stuffed with beans. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Only children's chairs are stuffed with beans. II. All stuffed tigers are stuffed with beans. III. Stuffed monkeys are not stuffed with beans. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All chickens are birds. Fact 2: Some chickens are hens. Fact 3: Female birds lay eggs. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All birds lay eggs. II. Hens are birds. III. Some chickens are not hens. Choose the correct answer from the options given below: