In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should eating Paan at public places be made punishable? Argument I: Yes, people eat Paan and spit and makes public places dirty. Argument II: No, Indians love Paan.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should eating Paan at public places be made punishable? Argument I: Yes, people eat Paan and spit and makes public places dirty. Argument II: No, Indians love Paan. Correct Answer if only argument I is strong.
According to the Argument 1, people spit in the public places and make those dirty, which is an ill-practice, further justifying the statement.
According to the Argument 2, people love eating paan so it shouldn't be made punishable. Eating paan still cannot confirm if the public places would made dirty or not, therefore, weakening the argument.
Therefore, argument 1 is the stronger one.