In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No bike is a two-wheeler. Statement II: All wheels are bikes. Conclusion I: No two-wheeler is a wheel. Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers.
In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No bike is a two-wheeler. Statement II: All wheels are bikes. Conclusion I: No two-wheeler is a wheel. Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers. Correct Answer Only conclusion I follows
The least possible Venn diagram is as follows:
[ alt="30.12.2018.014" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/12/30.12.2018.014.PNG" style="width: 293px; height: 150px;">
Conclusion I: No two-wheeler is a wheel → True (all wheels are bikes and no bike is a two-wheeler)
Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers → False, it is not possible.
Hence, only conclusion I follows.