In the question below are given three statements, followed by conclusions: I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Few bikes are cruisers. All racers are cruisers. Only a few racers are cycles. Conclusions: I. A few cruisers are bikes. II. Few cycles are neither racer nor cruiser.
In the question below are given three statements, followed by conclusions: I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Few bikes are cruisers. All racers are cruisers. Only a few racers are cycles. Conclusions: I. A few cruisers are bikes. II. Few cycles are neither racer nor cruiser. Correct Answer <p>If conclusion I follows</p>
The only possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows:
[ alt="Bank PO QID Harsha 13 June Madhu(Dia) 12" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/06/Bank%20PO_QID_Harsha_13%20June_Madhu%28Dia%29_12.PNG">
Conclusions:
I. A few cruisers are bikes → It’s sure, hence true.
II. Few cycles are neither racer nor cruiser → It’s not sure, hence false.
Hence, conclusion I follows