In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No blanket is bedsheet No chair is blanket Conclusions: I. Only blanket is bedsheet II. Few blanket are chair III. No bedsheet is chair
In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No blanket is bedsheet No chair is blanket Conclusions: I. Only blanket is bedsheet II. Few blanket are chair III. No bedsheet is chair Correct Answer None follows
The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,
[ alt="Coded logic syllogism Rimpa rework 25 Qs.docx 10" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/12/Coded_logic_syllogism_Rimpa_rework_25_Qs.docx%2010.png" style="width: 289px; height: 43px;">
I. Only blanket is bedsheet → False (It is not definite)
II. Few blanket are chair → False (It is not definite)
III. No bedsheet is chair → False (It is not definite)
Hence, none of the conclusion follows.