Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them. Which of the following conclusions could be validity drawn from the premises? Premises: a) Some rings are bells b) No ring is ornament Conclusions:

Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them. Which of the following conclusions could be validity drawn from the premises? Premises: a) Some rings are bells b) No ring is ornament Conclusions: Correct Answer All bells are not ornaments

Minimum possible figure

[ alt="1113" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/20/05/1113.PNG" style="width: 333px; height: 93px;">

Conclusions:

1) All bells are ornaments → False (Part of bells which is rings is never ornament so given conclusion is not possible)

2) Some ornaments are not bells → False (It is possible but not definite)

3) No ring is bell → False (It is given that some rings are bells)

4) All bells are not ornaments → True ((Part of bells which is rings is never ornament so some part of bells is never ornament)

Hence, all bells are not ornaments can be drawn from the given premises.

Related Questions

A box contains three types of rings. Four square rings, three circular rings and three hexagonal rings. 3 rings are drawn randomly. What is the probability that rings drawn contain 2 square rings?
In the following question below some statements are given followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statement: I. Only a few balls are bells. II. No bells are ring. Conclusion: I. Some balls are ring. II. No rings are balls.
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them. Which of the following conclusions could be validity drawn from the premises? Premises: (i) All fans are tubes (ii) Bulbs are not tubes Conclusions: (A) Fans are not bulbs (B) All tubes are fans (C) Fans are bulbs (D) No tube is bulb Select the correct answer from the options given below:
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. Some bangles are anklet. II. All anklet are rings. III. Some watches are bangles. Conclusions: I. All watches are rings. II. Some bangles are rings. III. All bangles are rings. IV. Some anklets are watches.
Given below are two premises ((a) and (b)). From those two premises four conclusions (i), (ii), (iii) & (iv) are drawn. Select the code that states the conclusions validly drawn from the premises (taking singly or jointly.) Premises : (a) Untouchability is a curse. (b) All hot pans are untouchable. Conclusions : (i) All hot pans are curse. (ii) Some untouchable things are hot pans. (iii) All curses are untouchability. (iv) Some curses are untouchability.
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them. Which of the following conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises? (a) Some bags are tables (b) All bags are chairs Conclusions: (i) Some tables are chairs (ii) No chair is table (iii) Some chairs are bags (iv) Some bags are not tables Select the correct answer from the options given below:
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. A + B means “some A are B”. A & B means “all A are B”. A @ B means “some A are not B”. A % B means “no A is B”. Statements: Roses + pans Pans @ rings Cats & rings Ring % bat Conclusions: I. Cats & pans is a possibility II. Roses @ rings III. Cat % bat IV. Rose % cat
Given below are two premises (a and b). From those two premises four conclusions (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are drawn. Select the code that states the conclusion/conclusions drawn validly (taking the premises singularly or jointly). Premises : (a) All bats are mammals. (b) No birds are bats. Conclusions : (i) No birds are mammals. (ii) Some birds are not mammals. (iii) No bats are birds. (iv) All mammals are bats.
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them. Which of the following conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises? Premises: I. Some bricks are stones. II. All cakes are bricks. Conclusions:
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them (taking singly or together). Which of the following conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises? Premises:  i) All cats are animals. ii) Birds are not cats. Conclusions: a) Birds are not animals. b) Cats are not Birds. c) All animals are cats. d) Some animals are cats.