Which of the following statement is/are correct? The Sanskrit poet Dindima was honored with the title "Kavisarvabhauma" by Deva Raya-II. Mallikarjuna also assumed the title of "Gajwetkar" like his father Deva Raya-II. During the time of Mallikarjuna, a Chinese traveler "Mahuyan" came to Vijayanagar by sea route. Select the correct code from below.

Which of the following statement is/are correct? The Sanskrit poet Dindima was honored with the title "Kavisarvabhauma" by Deva Raya-II. Mallikarjuna also assumed the title of "Gajwetkar" like his father Deva Raya-II. During the time of Mallikarjuna, a Chinese traveler "Mahuyan" came to Vijayanagar by sea route. Select the correct code from below. Correct Answer Only 2 and 3

The correct answer is option 2 i.e. Only 2 and 3

  • The Telugu poet "Srinatha" was honored with the title "Kavisarvabhauma" by Deva Raya-II.
  • The reputed Sanskrit scholar "Dindima" was appointed as the court poet of Deva Raya-II.
  • The famous scholar Dindima was defeated in a debate by the Telgu poet Srinatha.
  • The king honored (Srinatha) his appreciation with a "Kanakabhisheka" ceremony (the "showering of gold coins on the head"). 
  • After the death of Deva Raya-II, Mallikarjuna Raya became (1446-65 AD) succeeded his father.

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As a trade war looms, one of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s biggest weapons could be boycotts of American brands by his country’s legion of consumers. But Xi would also be risking collateral damage at home, The China operations of all-American brands ranging from Coca-Cola Co. and McDonald’s Corp. to Walt Disney Co. are co-owned by state-backed Chinese firms.  Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. One of Coke’s main China partners is government-backed COFCO Corp., Shanghai Disneyland is part owned by a local consortium, and McDonald’s franchisee in the country is controlled by state-backed conglomerate Citic Ltd. and private-equity firm Citic Capital Holdings.  II. Even when Chinese companies don’t have direct ownership links with U.S. brands, boycotts or other non-tariff retaliation would hit the local partners of those American companies. III. The number of big clean wins in terms of striking against the other guy (American brands) - without accidentally punching your own guy (Chinese firms) in the face - is extremely large.