Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

All practicing lawyers have LLB degree. All MBBS degree holders are doctors. No doctors have LLB degree. From the above statement, which one of the options can be logically deduced?

All practicing lawyers have LLB degree. All MBBS degree holders are doctors. No doctors have LLB degree. From the above statement, which one of the options can be logically deduced? Correct Answer Every individual is either a practicing lawyer or does not have a MBBS degree.

Given:

All practicing lawyers have LLB degree. All MBBS degree holders are doctors. No doctors have LLB degree.

1) Every individual is either a practicing lawyer or does not have a MBBS degree. → True, as it is given that All practicing lawyers have LLB degree. All MBBS degree holders are doctors. No doctors have LLB degree. This implies that the person practicing lawyer does not have MBBS degree as given in the statement.

2) Every individual is either not a practicing lawyer or does not have a MBBS degree. → False, as it is not given in the statement.

3) Every individual is either not a practicing lawyer or has a MBBS degree. → False, As it is not given not a practicing lawyer has a MBBS degree.

4) Every individual is either a practicing lawyer or has a MBBS degree. → False, It is necessary that every individual has MBBS degree or practicing lawyer.

Hence, Every individual is either a practicing lawyer or does not have a MBBS degree is the correct answer.

 

Related Questions

Given below are two premises a) and b). Four conclusions are drawn from them. Select the code that states validly drawn conclusion(s). [Taking the premises individually or jointly] Premises: a) All judges are lawyers. b) No doctors are lawyers. Conclusions: i) No lawyers are doctors. ii) No doctors are judges. iii) All lawyers are judges. iv) Some doctors are judges.
In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1: Some doctors are engineers. Statement 2: All engineers are lawyers. Conclusion I: Some lawyers are doctors. Conclusion II: All lawyers are engineers. Conclusion III: Some engineers are doctors.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statement. Statements: 1. All judges are lawyers. 2. Some lawyers are seniors. Conclusions: I. Some seniors are judges. II. Some seniors are lawyers. III. Some lawyers are judges. IV. Some judges are seniors. 
Ten candidates appear for an interview and six of them are selected. There are two M.Techs, two MBAs, two MBBS and four LLB among the candidates. At least one MBA candidate is selected, of the six selected candidates, exactly one must be an M.Tech candidate. If two MBBS candidates are selected, then which of the following statements can be TRUE?
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them (taking, singly or together). Which conclusions are validly drawn? Select the correct answer from the code given below. Premises: (i) All lawyers are extroverts. (ii) Some wisemen are extroverts. Conclusions: (a) All lawyers are wisemen. (b) All wisemen are lawyers. (c) Some extroverts are wisemen. (d) All extroverts are lawyers.
Given below the three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the conclusion(s) follow/s from the statements. Statements: 1. All lawyers are professionals. 2. Some lawyers are intelligent. 3. No intelligent man is prosperous. Conclusion: I. At least some lawyers are prosperous is a possibility. II. All lawyers, if they are intelligent, are also prosperous.
Three Statements followed by three Conclusions are given below. You have to take the Statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows/ follow from the Statements, disregarding the commonly known facts: Statement-1 : Some doctors are teachers. Statement-2 : All teachers are engineers. Statement-3 : All engineers are scientists. Conclusion-I : Some scientists are doctors. Conclusion-II : All engineers are doctors. Conclusion-III : Some engineers are doctors. Which one of the following is correct?
Among the following statements, two are contradictory to each other. Select the code that represents them: Statements: (a) All judges are lawyers. (b) Some judges are lawyers. (c) Some judges are not lawyers. (d) No judges are lawyers.
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, Il and Ill. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All engineers are doctors. All doctors are lawyers. No lawyer is a dancer. Conclusions: I. No doctor is a dancer. Il. No engineer is dancer, Ill. Some lawyers are engineers.
Statements and conclusions derived from them are given below. Select the correct option about conclusions. Statements: a. All carpenters are doctors. b. All carpenters are writers. Conclusions: I. All writers are doctors. II. Some doctors are writers. III. Generally doctors are writers. IV. All doctors are carpenters.