Which of the conclusions obtained from poverty ratios calculated for Rajasthan according to Suresh Tendulkar method is/are correct? i) Poverty ratio in rural areas of the State has increased by 10.3 percent between 2009-10 and 2011-12. ii) Poverty ratio in urban areas of the State has declined by 9.2 percent between 2009-10 and 2011-12. iii) Poverty ratios in the State have declined in both the years 2000-10 aid 2011-12 compared to India. iv) Poverty ratio in 2011-12 was estimated 14.7 percent for Rajasthan and 21.9 percent for India.

Which of the conclusions obtained from poverty ratios calculated for Rajasthan according to Suresh Tendulkar method is/are correct? i) Poverty ratio in rural areas of the State has increased by 10.3 percent between 2009-10 and 2011-12. ii) Poverty ratio in urban areas of the State has declined by 9.2 percent between 2009-10 and 2011-12. iii) Poverty ratios in the State have declined in both the years 2000-10 aid 2011-12 compared to India. iv) Poverty ratio in 2011-12 was estimated 14.7 percent for Rajasthan and 21.9 percent for India. Correct Answer ii, iii and iv

The correct answer is ii, iii and iv.

Key Points

  • In 2005, the Planning Commission constituted an expert group chaired by Suresh Tendulkar to review methodology for poverty estimation.
  • The committee was given the task to address the following three shortcomings of the previous methods-
    • Consumption patterns were linked to the 1973-74 Poverty Line Baskets (PLBs) of goods and services, whereas there were significant changes in the consumption patterns of the poor since that time, which were not reflected in the poverty estimates
    • There were issues with the adjustment of prices for inflation, both spatially (across regions) and temporally (across time)
    • Earlier poverty lines assumed that health and education would be provided by the State and formulated poverty lines accordingly. 
  • Findings for Rajasthan-
Area Poverty ratio in 2009-10 Poverty ratio in 2011-12 Change
Rural 26.40 16.05 -10.35
Urban 19.90 10.69 -9.21

 

  • As we can see, statement 1 is incorrect as there is a decline in the poverty ration.
  • Statement 2 is correct, i.e. Poverty ratio in urban areas of the State has declined by 9.2 percent between 2009-10 and 2011-12.
  • Statement 3 is correct since there is a decline in both cases.
  • The poverty ratio in 2011-12 was estimated at 14.7 percent for Rajasthan and 21.9 percent for India. Hence, statement 4 is correct.

Additional Information

  • Some of the important recommendations of the Tendulkar Committee-
    • A shift away from calorie consumption-based poverty estimation
    • A uniform Poverty Line Baskets (PLB) across rural and urban India
    • A change in the price adjustment procedure to correct spatial and temporal issues with price adjustment
    • Incorporation of private expenditure on health and education while estimating poverty.

Link: https://rural.nic.in/sites/default/files/WorkingPaper_Poverty_DoRD_Sept_2020.pdf

Related Questions

In the question below, is given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: The numbers are impressive. In its quest towards Swachh Bharat, the government has built 4.98 crore rural household latrines in the last three years. What's more, recent surveys by the NSSO and the Quality Council of India show that over 90% people with access to toilets are using them. Launched with the idea of Clean India, it is expanding from urban to the rural areas and is spreading awareness among the masses. Courses of action: I. Given that most rural areas in India lack proper drainage and a sewage network, the government has focused on building twin-pit toilets. But there is no data on whether the size of hastily built twin pits takes into account the number of users, and whether each pit is enough to collect waste for three years.  II. While this is a positive indicator, there are many other areas that need attention such as the shortage of water, sensitization of citizens, proper maintenance and usage of toilets, and overcoming the resistance to dry manure made from human waste.  III. One of the biggest challenges for Swachh Bharat in rural areas is managing liquid waste, which pollutes natural water bodies. Though the scheme covers this aspect as well, the immediate focus is to deal with open defecation.