Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. United Arab Emirates
  2. Turkey
  3. Jordon
  4. Lebanon
4 views

1 Answers

Option 1 : United Arab Emirates

The correct answer is United Arab Emirates.

  • Astronaut and engineer Nora Al Matrooshi is an Emirati. She will undergo training with NASA Astronaut Group 23 to become a specialist for international missions after being chosen in April 2021.
  • She holds a BS from the United Arab Emirates University and is a mechanical engineer by trade.
  • The next two astronauts of the United Arab Emirates' space programme were announced on April 10, 2021.
  • Additionally, it features Noura al-Matroushi, the nation's first female astronaut.
  • The two astronauts' names were revealed on Twitter by Dubai's autocratically-ruled ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who also holds the positions of vice president and prime minister.

  • The class of NASA Astronaut Group 23, often known as "The Flies," was announced on December 6th, 2021, and is expected to report for duty sometime in 2022.
  • Seven males and five women were among the twelve astronaut candidates who were chosen.
  • Initially scheduled to arrive at the Johnson Space Center in Houston for training in the summer of 2021, the Group 23 Astronaut Candidates will be qualified for future missions to the International Space Station in low Earth orbit aboard NASA or commercial crew vehicles, the Moon via the Artemis programme, and Mars once their roughly two-year training programme is finished. 
4 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should capital punishment be removed Arguments: I. Yes. No person has the right to take someone else’s life. II. No. There are some gruesome cases and capital punishment should be given in these rarest of rare cases.  ?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should schools have a mental health check up every once in a while Arguments: I. No. Kids don’t face mental health issues. II. Yes. Mental health is as important as physical health.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should plastics be banned completely Arguments: I. Yes. All the types of plastic are non-biodegradable. II. No. Some plastics can be recycled and used again. A complete ban is not necessary.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government avoid coal and look for more conventional energy sources Arguments: I. Yes. Burning of coal releases harmful pollutants. II. No. It is the cheapest form of electricity available for now.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should use of artificial fertilisers be banned Arguments: I. Yes. Over-use of fertilisers make land barren overtime and pollute water bodies. II. No. They give better results than natural fertilisers and improve growth.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government fund more in education sector Arguments: I. Yes. This would be an investment in the better future of our country. II. No. There is no need to waste so much money.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views