Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All buildings are shops. 2. Some shops are boutiques. 3. No restaurant is a boutique. Conclusions: I. Some boutiques are buildings. II. Some restaurants being buildings is a possibility. III. No restaurant is a shop.?

Only conclusions II and III follow
Only conclusion II follows
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusions I and II follow

LohaHridoy

9 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 2 : Only conclusion II follows

Least Possible Venn diagrams:

[ alt="F1 Madhuri SSC 28.04.2022 D27" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/04/F1_Madhuri_SSC_28.04.2022_D27.png" style="width: 333px; height: 126px;">

Conclusions:

I. Some boutiques are buildings → Doesn't Follow (As some shops are boutiques and all buildings are shops, so we can not say anything definite about some boutiques are building.it is a possibility)

This possibility scenario can be shown using the below Venn diagram:

[ alt="F3 Madhuri SSC 25.05.2022 D1 V2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/05/F3_Madhuri_SSC_25.05.2022_D1_V2.png" style="width: 324px; height: 127px;">

Here, No boutique is a building. that is why this statement is a possibility.

II. Some restaurants being buildings is a possibility → Follow (As no restaurant is a boutique , some boutique are shops and all buildings are shops. so we can not say anything about some restaurants are building, it is a possibility )

This possibility scenario can be shown using the below Venn diagram:

[ alt="F3 Madhuri SSC 25.05.2022 D2 V2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/22/05/F3_Madhuri_SSC_25.05.2022_D2_V2.png" style="width: 228px; height: 171px;">

Here, some buildings are restaurants that's why this given possibility is followed.

III. No restaurant is a shop → Doesn't Follow (As some boutiques are shops and no boutique is a restaurant, so No restaurant is a shop)

Thus, Only conclusion II follows.

Hence, the correct answer is " Only conclusion II follows".

9 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

n the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: Some Honest are Actor. Some Politician are Actor. All Doctor are Honest. Conclusions: I. Some Doctor being Politician is a possibility. II. Some Politician being Honest is a possibility.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below are given three statements followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All A are B. All B are D. Some D are E. Conclusions: I. Some D are B. II. Some A are not E. III. No D is B. IV. Some E being A is a possibility.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below are given four statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Hospital is Restaurant Some Restaurant is not Hotel Some Hotel is Tower All Tower is Spa Conclusions: I. All Hospital can be Spa II. Some Restaurant are Tower III. No Restaurant is Tower IV. Some Spa is definitely Hotel?

1 Answers 5 Views

Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. Some instruments are machines. 2. All instruments are gadgets. Conclusions: I. No machine is a gadget. II. Some machines are gadgets.?

1 Answers 7 Views

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. No cup is a plate. 2. All plates are cutleries. 3. No cutlery is a spoon. Conclusions: I. Some cutleries are plates. II. No cutlery is a cup. III. Some spoons being cups is a possibility?

1 Answers 7 Views

Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true even it they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements Statements: 1. Some plants are trees. 2. All herbs are plants. Conclusions: I. Some plants are herbs. II. All herbs are trees is a possibility.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. All uncles are relatives. 2. Some relatives are neighbours. 3. All neighbours are employed. Conclusions: I. Some neighbours are uncles. II. Some uncles are employed. III. Some relatives are employed.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true even if they do not conform to real-world knowledge, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: 1. Some cottages are huts. 2. All huts are sheds. Conclusions: I. Some sheds are cottages. II. No shed is a cottage.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No shop is a restaurant. All restaurants are parks. Conclusions: I. Some parks are restaurants. II. No restaurant is a shop.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All shops are parks. Some shops are schools. Conclusions: I. Some parks are schools. II. No school is a park. III. Some parks are shops.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)