Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
5 views

1 Answers

Option 1 : 1 only

  • The output of the Mealy machine is a function of the present state as well as present input, so the output does not remain stable over the entire clock.
  • The outputs of a Mealy Machine can change asynchronously in response to any change in the inputs.
  • The disadvantage associated with the circuit is that if any input transient glitches are present, they are directly conveyed to the output.
  • The output need not change at a Clock Pulse.
  • It requires less number of states and thereby less hardware to solve any problem.


[ alt="26 June 1" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/08/26%20June_1.png" style="width: 160px; height: 46px;">

[ alt="F2 S.B Madhu 15.07.20 D2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/20/07/F2_S.B_Madhu_15.07.20_D2.png" style="width: 655px; height: 136px;">

 

Mealy Machine

Moore Machine

Output depends on both the present state and present input

Output depends on only Present/current state

It has fewer states than Moore machine

Has more states than the Mealy machine

The mealy machine reacts faster to inputs, they generally react in the same clock cycle

Moore machines, more logic is required to decode the outputs resulting in more circuit delays, they generally react one clock cycle later
5 views

Related Questions

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should fight for Cauvery river stop between the states Arguments: I. Yes, because instead of fighting over it, the river should be saved and actions should be taken in cleaning up. II. No, because this fight is benefiting the political parties in many ways.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should outside food items be allowed inside multiplexes Arguments: I. Yes, this would be an advantage as the food items they sell are overcharged. II. No, as this would cause the hike of ticket prices.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should strikes be made legal in a democracy Arguments: Yes. Strikes give people a way of expressing their disapproval and demands, which is a part of democracy. No. People take undue advantage of democracy by conducting strikes. ?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Since the University of Delhi has a large number of outstation students, should the local students get priority admissions over the outstation students Arguments: Yes. The locals do not want to share their resources with the outsiders. No. The admissions are on the basis of competition and better students deserve to get admissions first irrespective of the place they come from.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should use of artificial fertilisers be banned Arguments: I. Yes. Over-use of fertilisers make land barren overtime and pollute water bodies. II. No. They give better results than natural fertilisers and improve growth.  ?
1 Answers 5 Views