Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. P – Home, Q – Power, R – Defence, S – Telecom, T – Finance
  2. R – Home, S – Power, P – Defence, Q – Telecom, T – Finance
  3. P – Home, Q – Power, T – Defence, S – Telecom, U – Finance
  4. Q – Home, U – Power, T – Defence, R – Telecom, P – Finance
5 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : R – Home, S – Power, P – Defence, Q – Telecom, T – Finance

Let us check each option,
a) R has received a portfolio (Power) that is neither home nor finance, therefore this does not fulfil the given conditions.
b) R has received Home, S and Q have power and telecom, and P and T both have portfolios while U does not, thereby satisfying all conditions.
c) S and U both have portfolios, therefore making this impossible.
d) R has received a portfolio that is neither home nor finance, therefore this does not fulfil the given conditions.
Therefore, b is the correct distribution.
5 views

Related Questions

The following question consists of six sentences of a passage. The first and the sixth sentences are given in the beginning as S1 and S6. The middle four sentences in each have been jumbled up and labelled P, Q, R and S. You are required to find the proper sequence of the four sentences and mark your response accordingly. S1: In mechanical efforts, you improve by perpetual practice. S6: There is neither excuse nor temptation for the latter. P: He cannot go on shooting wide or falling short, and still fancy that he is making progress. Q: This is so because the object to be attained is a matter of actual experiment in which you either succeed or fail. R: He must either correct his aim or persevere in his error with his eyes open. S: If a man aims at a mark with a bow and arrow, he must either hit it or aim it. The correct sequence should be?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Can the Government provide housing facilities to the homeless Arguments: Yes. The Government can do anything and the homeless cannot get homes without the help of the Government. No. The Government does not have enough resources to provide for the housing facilities for such a large number of people. Instead the Government should build homeless shelters.?
1 Answers 6 Views
All actions to address climate change ultimately involve costs. Funding is vital in order for countries like India to design and implement adaptation and mitigation plans and projects. The problem is more severe for developing countries like India, which would be one of the hardest hit by climate change, given its need to finance development. Most countries do indeed treat climate change as real threat and are striving to address it in a more comprehensive and integrated manner with the limited resources at their disposal. With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: 1. Climate change is not a challenge for developed countries. 2. Climate change is a complex policy issue and also a development issue for many countries. 3. Ways and means of finance must be found to enable developing countries to enhance their adaptive capacity. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
1 Answers 5 Views
Statement: US President Donald Trump on Thursday cancelled the talks scheduled for June 12 with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. Which of the following objection(s) might be a probable reason(s) for the above-taken step by US President Donald Trump I. The US President cited North Korea's recent "tremendous anger and open hostility" as the reason for him cancelling the summit. II. Donald Trump did not want to make any relations with North Korea and wants a nuclear war between the two nations and as a result has cancelled the summit. III. In a letter to the North Korean Leader, US president cited that the statements released by the North Korean Vice Minister Choe Son-hui represented "tremendous anger and open hostility", as a reason for cancelling the summit. IV. North Korea is the US’s rival and building any relationship with the Korean nation will bring economic harm to the US and as a result has cancelled the summit.?
1 Answers 7 Views