Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Govt. of India Act, 1935
  2. Govt. of India Act, 1907
  3. Govt. of India Act, 1929
  4. Govt. of India Act, 1919
4 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : Govt. of India Act, 1919

The correct answer is Govt. of India Act, 1919.

Govt. of India Act 1919:

  • ​Viceroy: Chelmsford.
  • Secretary of State for India: Edwin Montagu.
  • It clearly outlined the jurisdiction of the central & provincial governments.
  • Dyarchy in the provinces was introduced.
  • ​The subjects of the provincial administration were divided into two parts:
    • ​Reserved Subjects & Transferred subjects.
  • The direct election system was adopted in provinces.
  • Women were also granted voting rights in a partial manner.
  • The bicameral system was introduced in the Central Legislature.
  • The appointment of the Indian High Commissioner was carried out.
  • Separate representation to Sikhs, Christians & Anglo-Indian was granted.

  • The Indian Statutory Commission was a group of seven British Members of Parliament of United Kingdom that had been dispatched to India in 1928 to study constitutional reform in Britain's most important colonial dependency. It was commonly referred to as the Simon Commission after its chairman, Sir John Simon.
4 views

Related Questions

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?
1 Answers 5 Views