Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. 2011 & 2013
  2. 2013 & 2015
  3. 2011 & 2012
  4. 2014 & 2015
5 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : 2011 & 2012

As per the given data,

Sum of the exports of company A, B and C in the year 2011 = 2000 + 2000 + 3000 = Rs. 7000 lakh

Sum of the exports of company A, B and C in the year 2012 = 2000 + 3000 + 2000 = Rs. 7000 lakh

Sum of the exports of company A, B and C in the year 2013 = 5000 + 1000 + 5000 = Rs. 11000lakh

Sum of the exports of company A, B and C in the year 2014 = 2000 + 5000 + 3000 = Rs. 10000 lakh

Sum of the exports of company A, B and C in the year 2015 = 1000 + 2000 + 3000 = Rs. 6000 lakh

∴ The pairs of year 2011 and 2012, the total exports from the three Companies together are equal

5 views

Related Questions

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Textiles maker Arvind Ltd. is planning to invest Rs. 500 crore per annum for the next 4-5 years with an aim to double revenue from its textile business to Rs. 12,000 crore. The company is in the process of de-merging its brands and engineering businesses into separate entities.  Courses of action: I. The company is looking dramatic ramp up in garmenting (making garments from fabrics) from 10 per cent at present to 50 per cent over time. A big chunk of this planned investment will be for garmenting. II. The company will be looking at developing 3 large garment clusters in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat. Each of these clusters will employ 4,000-8,000 workers.  III. The company is planning to double its textile business from Rs. 6,000 crore to Rs. 12,000 crore in 5 years time. It plans to invest Rs. 500 crore every year for the next five years to expand its textile business.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Kalyan Jewellers has chalked out an aggressive expansion plan to double its retail stores to 250 in India and abroad as well as the turnover to Rs. 25,000 crore over the next five years.The Kerala-based jeweller currently operates 100 stores in the country and 32 overseas with a turnover of Rs. 10,500 crore in the 2017-18 fiscal year. Courses of action: I. The company is targeting to reach 250 stores in the next five years and investments will be met through internal accruals.  II. The company is expanding its retail network aggressively. In this fiscal, it earmarked Rs. 1,000 crore to open new stores. Already, Rs. 600 crore has been spent to launch 10 stores in the first of this fiscal and the remaining Rs. 400 crore will go towards adding 9-10 more stores by March 2019. III. The company is ‘hyper-local’ in nature and jewellery designs sold in each store keeps in mind the taste and traditions of the local region.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: The Centre on Wednesday approved construction of nearly 6.28 lakh more affordable houses for urban poor in eleven states under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna, with Uttar Pradesh getting the largest share of over 2.34 lakh housing units. In a statement, the Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry said that considering the extraordinary situation due to the recent heavy floods in Kerala, it has decided to release Rs 486.87 crore for first and second instalments together to the state by relaxing norm in the sanctioned projects under PMAY(U). Courses of action: I. The government is targeting one crore houses to be constructed in urban areas across the country under under PMAY (U) over a period of seven years from 2015 to 2022.  II. Last month, the committee also sanctioned construction of 1.12 lakh affordable houses for the poor in eight states.  III. With the sanction for the construction of 6,28,488 housing units, the total number of houses being funded under the PMAY (Urban) stands at 60,28,628 across the country so far.?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Fraud-hit Punjab National (PNB) today said it has no plans to close operations at its Brady House branch, the fountainhead of the Rs. 14,000 crore Nirav Modi scam. II. Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi, in connivance with certain bank officials, allegedly cheated PNB of about Rs. 14,000 crore through issuance of fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs).  Conclusions: I. PNB's Brady House branch in Mumbai had fraudulently issued LoUs for the group of companies belonging to Nirav Modi since March 2011. PNB has no plans to close operations in the Brady House branch in Mumbai. II. Reallocation of some of the accounts is part of the regular restructuring process at PNB to strengthen internal systems and processes and centralize certain critical functions  III. With regards to provision made for the loss incurred on account of the Nirav Modi fraud, the bank provided Rs. 7,178 crore, 50 per cent of the total amount of Rs. 14,356 crore, in the fourth quarter of 2017-18. The remaining amount will be covered in the three quarters of the current fiscal year.?
1 Answers 5 Views