Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Only I is sufficient 
  2. Only II is sufficient
  3. Both I & II together are sufficient 
  4. None is sufficient
5 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : Both I & II together are sufficient 

Sum of 8 son and 2 daughter = 15 × 10 = 150

From statement I :

Let daughter’s age is x, x + 6

From statement II :

Sum of 8 son = 12 × 8 = 96

Sum of two daughter = 150 - 96 = 54

From statement I and II:

x + x + 6 = 54

⇒ x = 24 years

So, the age of elder daughter = x + 6 = 24 + 6 = 30 years

∴ Both statement I and II are sufficient.

5 views

Related Questions

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences in which first and the last sentence is given. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the sentences to form a coherent paragraph. S1- Better standard of living for the family is one of the advantages of women/female education. P- An educated mother will earn as good as the father of the family and will look after the financial needs of her family in a much better way.  Q- It doesn’t take a mathematician to conclude that a family relying on double wages is more content and happy than a family which relies on the income of a single parent. R- Women are more concerned about the health of their family than men and have a great sense of hygiene too.  S- Two incomes under the same roof will improve the quality of living and also ensure better education and facilities to the children, not to mention that a happy family will ultimately lead to a happy society. S6- Even working women are constantly concerned about their family’s health and don’t compromise with it at any cost.?
1 Answers 7 Views
In the following question, a given question is followed by information in two statements. You have to decide the data in which statement (s) is sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. Amita, Priya, Sebastian, Trisha, Mauli, Jovita and Angelin have their flights to be departed from different airports such as Mumbai airport, Delhi airport, Chandigarh airport, Bangalore airport, Assam airport, Chennai airport and Amritsar airport. From which airport does Jovita’s flight depart I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport. II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
Two statements are followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has sought information on offshore investments by directors of RNT Associates, a closely held firm which functions as a family office and investment vehicle of Ratan Tata.  II. The ED order, dated June 14, also calls for details of investments or loans from RNT Associates and its directors to a Singapore-based entity, RNT Associates Ltd. Conclusions: The order is under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the documents are being sought for the purpose of investigation under FEMA. The nature of queries from Enforcement Directorate is related to RNT Associates’ investment portfolio. It is compliant with all disclosures and existing laws governing investments and is extending all cooperation.?
1 Answers 7 Views