1 Answers
Option 4 : Neither conclusion 1 nor 2 follows
The correct answer is option 4, i.e. Neither conclusion 1 nor 2 follows.
In this type of questions, conclusion is not specifically mentioned. It needs to be deduced from the given statements. From both the statements, we infer that Enforcement Directorate (ED) is investigating the offshore investments by officials from RNT Associates. Both the conclusions mentioned are irrelevant with the given context. In the first conclusion, it introduces a new edge to the story with the introduction of FEMA and is thus irrelevant as we cannot conclude anything based on something which is not even stated. Moreover, second conclusion is also incorrect as it instead of a conclusion looks a rephrase of the stated statement. We haven’t made any significant conclusion based on the information stated and thus, both the conclusions mentioned can be rejected.
7 views
Answered