Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. 1750 A.D
  2. 1754 A.D
  3. 1757 A.D
  4. 1761 A.D
4 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : 1757 A.D

  • The Battle of Plassey was fought in 1757 between East Indian Company and Nawab of Bengal.
  • The battle was won by East India Company.
4 views

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The government is working on a plan to set up a waterway freight corridor to connect the mainland with the northeastern states via Bangladesh at a cost of Rs 5,000 crore. The move would substantially reduce the time taken to transport goods to the eight northeastern states and costs.  Which of the following support the idea that the time of transportation will be reduced between the eight northeastern states Arguments: I.The proposed 900-km waterway would be used to transport freight from the northern and eastern states to the northeast and would start near Haldia in West Bengal, go to the Sundarbans, merge into the Padma river in Bangladesh and then join up with the Brahmaputra in Assam.  II. Currently, highway connectivity to the northeastern states is patchy and transportation of goods by road entails a high cost and takes time. According to the ministry’s estimate, the waterway could help reduce the cost of transportation by about 70%.  III. The government is already developing a waterway along the Ganga river between Haldia and Allahabad (1,620 km) at a cost of Rs 4,500 crore. This link will also be utilised for trade between India and Bangladesh.?
1 Answers 6 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Textiles maker Arvind Ltd. is planning to invest Rs. 500 crore per annum for the next 4-5 years with an aim to double revenue from its textile business to Rs. 12,000 crore. The company is in the process of de-merging its brands and engineering businesses into separate entities.  Courses of action: I. The company is looking dramatic ramp up in garmenting (making garments from fabrics) from 10 per cent at present to 50 per cent over time. A big chunk of this planned investment will be for garmenting. II. The company will be looking at developing 3 large garment clusters in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat. Each of these clusters will employ 4,000-8,000 workers.  III. The company is planning to double its textile business from Rs. 6,000 crore to Rs. 12,000 crore in 5 years time. It plans to invest Rs. 500 crore every year for the next five years to expand its textile business.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Kalyan Jewellers has chalked out an aggressive expansion plan to double its retail stores to 250 in India and abroad as well as the turnover to Rs. 25,000 crore over the next five years.The Kerala-based jeweller currently operates 100 stores in the country and 32 overseas with a turnover of Rs. 10,500 crore in the 2017-18 fiscal year. Courses of action: I. The company is targeting to reach 250 stores in the next five years and investments will be met through internal accruals.  II. The company is expanding its retail network aggressively. In this fiscal, it earmarked Rs. 1,000 crore to open new stores. Already, Rs. 600 crore has been spent to launch 10 stores in the first of this fiscal and the remaining Rs. 400 crore will go towards adding 9-10 more stores by March 2019. III. The company is ‘hyper-local’ in nature and jewellery designs sold in each store keeps in mind the taste and traditions of the local region.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In the question below, a statement is given, followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Led by a strong response to its first super sports utility vehicle Urus, Italian sports car maker Lamborghini is likely to more than double its volumes in India by the end of 2019, a year ahead of its plan, and cross the milestone of 50-60 vehicles per annum. The company, which began deliveries for Urus in India in September, said the vehicle is already booked for the coming six-nine months in India much like the global markets, and it will help Lamborghini get new. customers into its fold. Courses of action: I. The company is planning not to increase the price of its vehicle despite significant rupee depreciation and wants to protect the attractive price of Urus for prospective buyers.  II. The super sports utility vehicle will drive volumes, super sports cars such as Huracan and Aventador will grow by 8-10%. The company feels an 8-10% growth in the segment is a realistic expectation in spite of the challenges.  III. More than 68% of Urus buyers are first-time Lamborghini buyers and makers are sure that this will have a positive rub-off effect on the super sports car segment too.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
Match List I with List II: List I (Method) List II (Purchase consideration) (A) Lump-sum payment method (I) Calculated by adding up the total amount (money value) of existing shares, preference shares and cash received from the purchasing company for the shareholders of the vendor company. (B) Net Assets Method (II) On the basis of ratio in which the shares of the transferee company are to be exchanged for the shares of the transferor company. (C) Net Payment Method (III) The amount to be paid by the transferee company to transferor company for amalgamation of its business. (D) Swap Ratio Method (IV) Arrived at by adding the agreed value of assets taken over and deducting there from the agreed values of liabilities. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:?
1 Answers 7 Views