Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Uttar Pradesh
  2. Rajasthan
  3. Himachal Pradesh
  4. Punjab
4 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : Punjab

Haryana was a part of Punjab, before India got its independence. It became a separate state in 1966 on linguistic basis.
4 views

Related Questions

In the following question, there are six sentences marked S1, S6, P, Q, R and S. The positions of S1 and S6 are fixed. Choose one of the options given below which would be the most logical sequence of the sentences in the passage. S1- India is the largest democracy in the world. P- These rights ensured that the real powers laid in the hands of the people. Q- Ruled by various kings and emperors and colonised by the Europeans for centuries, India became a democratic nation post its independence in the year 1947. R- Indian democratic government was formed after the nation attained independence in 1947. S- Thereafter, the citizens of India were given the right to vote and elect their leaders. S6- From that tie onwards, India has succeeded in maintaining its democratic nature.?
1 Answers 5 Views
A statement is given below in the question followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Jet Airways has defaulted on salary payments again. The cash-strapped airline on Wednesday sought over 10 more days from its employees to pay balance 25 per cent of their salaries for August. Jet Airways had paid 50 per cent of August salaries to its employees on September 11 and the rest was to be paid on Wednesday. But it could pay only half of the balance amount.  Courses of action: I. The cash-strapped airline, which is struggling to meet its cost of operations, had earlier attempted to cut salaries of its employees, but the move was met with stiff resistance that forced it to defer the plan.  II. Jet Airways will today remit half of the second installment of pending emoluments of its pilots, AMEs and senior management for August 2018. III. While the management regrets the attendant inconvenience, it also appreciates the continued support and understanding of its employees.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In the question below, a statement is given, followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Led by a strong response to its first super sports utility vehicle Urus, Italian sports car maker Lamborghini is likely to more than double its volumes in India by the end of 2019, a year ahead of its plan, and cross the milestone of 50-60 vehicles per annum. The company, which began deliveries for Urus in India in September, said the vehicle is already booked for the coming six-nine months in India much like the global markets, and it will help Lamborghini get new. customers into its fold. Courses of action: I. The company is planning not to increase the price of its vehicle despite significant rupee depreciation and wants to protect the attractive price of Urus for prospective buyers.  II. The super sports utility vehicle will drive volumes, super sports cars such as Huracan and Aventador will grow by 8-10%. The company feels an 8-10% growth in the segment is a realistic expectation in spite of the challenges.  III. More than 68% of Urus buyers are first-time Lamborghini buyers and makers are sure that this will have a positive rub-off effect on the super sports car segment too.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?
1 Answers 5 Views