Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Car buyers
  2. Students
  3. Corporate houses
  4. Home buyers
4 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : Home buyers

Cabinet has cleared amendments to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, incorporating changes suggested by a government appointed panel. The panel had suggested that home buyers should be treated as financial creditors, which will allow them to equitably participate in an insolvency resolution process. The panel has also suggested relaxations for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises under the IBC.
4 views

Related Questions

The first and the last parts of the sentence/paragraph are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentences are split into four parts and A, B, C and D. These four parts are not given in their order. Read the sentence/paragraph and find out which of the four combinations is correct. 1. With 80 laboratory-confirmed cases of the Zika virus already in A. in July the same year a single case was reported from Tamil Nadu’s Krishnagiri district. B. Jaipur, including 22 pregnant women, the latest outbreak is India’s most severe so far. C. In January 2017, three confirmed cases of Zika were reported from Ahmedabad, including a pregnant woman, D. Unlike in the case of the Ahmedabad outbreak that was kept under 6. wraps by the Health Ministry, there has been more transparency in the last two instances.?
1 Answers 6 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views