Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. If the data in statements I alone is sufficient to answer the question while the data in statement II along is not sufficient to answer the question.
  2. If the data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question while the data in statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
  3. If the data in statement III alone is sufficient to answer the question while the data in statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
  4. If the data in all the statements I, II and III together is necessary to answer the question.
  5. If the data in all the statements I, II and III together to the answer due question is not sufficient.
4 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : If the data in all the statements I, II and III together is necessary to answer the question.

Statement I:

Shefali may be travelling on Thursday, Friday or Saturday. Hence, Statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement II:

Shefali may be travelling on Wednesday, Thursday or Friday. Hence, statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement III: 

Shefali may be travelling on any day except Friday.

Statement I & II:

Shefali can be travelling on Thursday or Friday.

Statement I & III:

Shefali can be travelling on Thursday or Saturday.

Statement II and III

Shefali may be travelling on Wednesday or Thursday

Statement I, II & III:

Shefali is travelling on Thursday.

Hence, the data in all the statements I, II and III together is sufficient to answer the question.

4 views

Related Questions

A statement is given below in the question followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Jet Airways has defaulted on salary payments again. The cash-strapped airline on Wednesday sought over 10 more days from its employees to pay balance 25 per cent of their salaries for August. Jet Airways had paid 50 per cent of August salaries to its employees on September 11 and the rest was to be paid on Wednesday. But it could pay only half of the balance amount.  Courses of action: I. The cash-strapped airline, which is struggling to meet its cost of operations, had earlier attempted to cut salaries of its employees, but the move was met with stiff resistance that forced it to defer the plan.  II. Jet Airways will today remit half of the second installment of pending emoluments of its pilots, AMEs and senior management for August 2018. III. While the management regrets the attendant inconvenience, it also appreciates the continued support and understanding of its employees.?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?
1 Answers 7 Views
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?
1 Answers 5 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: Kuwait has proposed setting up an international protection mission for Palestinians. A draft UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution presented by Kuwait calls for measures to guarantee the safety and protection of Palestinian civilians" in the occupied Palestinian territories and Gaza Strip". Would setting up an international peace mission help to stop the ongoing issue Arguments: I. Yes, more than 100 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli firing in the last two months. II. No, Kuwait has no role to play in the ongoing war and must not interfere. III. No, Palestinians should be provided safety within the territories only and a new mission will result in more mass killings.?
1 Answers 5 Views