Consider the following officials and their functions during the Maurya Period in India: I. Pradeshta: Chief Justice of the Criminal Court II. Sannidhata: Chief Treasury Officer III. Pradesika: District Magistrate Which among the above is/are correctly matched?

Both I and III
Only III
Both I and II
All I, II and III

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : All I, II and III

Important Officials	Functions
Pradeshta	Chief Justice of the Criminal Court
Sannidhata	Chief Treasury Officer
Pradesika	District Magistrate
Samaharta	The Collector General of Revenue
Vyavaharika	The Chief Justice of the Civil Court
Dhamma Mahamatra	Propagation of Dhamma (was created by Ashoka)
Rashtrapala	The viceroys in charge of a province
Rajukas	Patwaris (Responsible for assessment of land)
Nagaraka	The Officer-in-charge of the city administration

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Which of the following statements is not true with regard to Highways and Roads (i) National Highways connect the state capitals, major cities, important ports, railway junctions, etc constitute about 1% of total road length in India. (ii) State Highways join the state capitals with district headquarters and other important towns constitute about 4% of total road length in India. (iii) District roads are the connecting link between District Headquarters and the other important nodes in the district and constitute about 14% of total road length in India. (iv) Rural roads are vital for providing links in rural areas and constitute about 80 per cent of the total road length in India ?

1 Answers 6 Views

Consider the following statements: 1. The President of India shall have the power to appoint and remove the Speaker of Lok Sabha. 2. The Speaker has to discharge the functions of his office himself throughout his term and cannot delegate his functions to the Deputy Speaker during his absence from the station or during his illness. Which of the statements given above is /are correct?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the following related to the Supreme Court of India. I. Article 125: Salaries of the Judges II. Article 127: Appointment of ad-hoc judges III. Article 126: Appointment of Acting Chief Justice Which among the above is/are correctly matched?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the following regarding the qualification required to become a Supreme Court Judge in India: I. He should be a citizen of India. II. He should have been a High Court Judge for at least 10 years. III. He should have been an advocate with the High Court or two or more courts in succession for a period of at least 15 years. Which among the above is/are NOT correct?

1 Answers 7 Views

Consider the following regarding the Vijayanagar Emperors and the foreign visitors to their courts during their reign: I. Nicolo de Conti: Deva Raya II II. Vasco da Gama: Vira Narasimha III. Fernao Nunji: Krishna Deva Raya Which among the above is/are correctly matched?

1 Answers 4 Views

The Second Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with the salary and emoluments of various constitutional functionaries in India. Consider the following with respect to this schedule of the Indian Constitution. I. Part A: Salary of the Judges of the Supreme Court II. Part C: Salary of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha III. Part E: Salary of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India Which among the above is/are NOT correctly matched?

1 Answers 8 Views

Which of the following statements about the Ilbert Bill (1883) is/are correct 1. It proposed to grant limited criminal jurisdiction to native officials. 2. It proposed to grant complete civil and criminal jurisdiction to native officials. 3. The proposed Bill generated opposition from England’s European subjects in India. 4. In spite of opposition to the Bill, it was passed without any modifications. Select the correct answer using the code given below.?

1 Answers 5 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Fraud-hit Punjab National (PNB) today said it has no plans to close operations at its Brady House branch, the fountainhead of the Rs. 14,000 crore Nirav Modi scam. II. Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi, in connivance with certain bank officials, allegedly cheated PNB of about Rs. 14,000 crore through issuance of fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs). Conclusions: I. PNB's Brady House branch in Mumbai had fraudulently issued LoUs for the group of companies belonging to Nirav Modi since March 2011. PNB has no plans to close operations in the Brady House branch in Mumbai. II. Reallocation of some of the accounts is part of the regular restructuring process at PNB to strengthen internal systems and processes and centralize certain critical functions III. With regards to provision made for the loss incurred on account of the Nirav Modi fraud, the bank provided Rs. 7,178 crore, 50 per cent of the total amount of Rs. 14,356 crore, in the fourth quarter of 2017-18. The remaining amount will be covered in the three quarters of the current fiscal year.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Statement: The US Department of Justice has launched a criminal probe into whether traders are manipulating the price of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, according to reports. Which of the following objection(s) may not be a probable reason(s) for the above-taken step by the US Department of Justice to launch the probe I. Cryptocurrencies should be banned as they are not legal and cannot be afforded by everyone. II. The probe focuses on illegal practices such as spoofing or flooding the market with fake orders to trick other traders into buying or selling. III. US Department conducts regular probes and it is not something big. IV. The probe focuses on identifying the cryptocurrencies and launch them into the market so that market is not affected.?

1 Answers 6 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)