Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Farmers protested against the government demanding a minimum support price for crops. Conclusions: 1. The government should give farmers the money to stop the protest. 2. The government should give them a minimum support price for their crops.?

Both 1 and 2 follow.
Only conclusion 1 follow.
Neither 1 nor 2 follows.
Only conclusion 2 follows.

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : Only conclusion 2 follows.

Conclusion 1: Farmers are protesting for minimum support price, not for money. So, giving money to the farmers is not going to stop the protest. So, conclusion 1 does not follow.

Conclusion 2: Protest can stop only if the government gives the farmers the minimum support price for their crops. So, the government should give them minimum support price to stop the protest. So, conclusion 2 follows.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some sabha are houses II. Only bill are money III. Only a few cash are bill Conclusions: I. All bill cannot be cash II. No sabha is money III. Some money are bill?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some sabha are houses II. Only bill are money III. Only a few cash are bill Conclusions: I. Some money being house is a possibility II. Some cash is not the bill is a possibility III. All money is a bill?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statements: 1. In the past ten years, chapters have been reduced in order to reduce the pressure on students. 2. One of the ways to eliminate frustration and depression from a student’s life is by reducing the syllabus. Conclusions: I. Students nowadays are happy and ignorant to studies. II. Burden of huge syllabus is one of the main reasons for hypertension among school students. Find which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: The officer insulted Rajeev in the presence of his colleagues. Conclusions: I. The officer did not like Rajeev. II. Rajeev was not well-known with his colleagues.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: The number of children immigrants in cities is increasing day by day and the reason is their desire to earn money doing small jobs. Conclusion I: Migration to big cities should be checked. Conclusion II: The children eagerly do small jobs in the cities to earn money.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: Two-third of the students of standard VIII consisting of 53 boys and 17 girls know cycling. Conclusions: Girls are poor cyclists Cycling is compulsory in this school.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: Death keeps no calendar. Conclusions: I. You can die only at night. II. Everyone has to die one day.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Choose the appropriate option. Statement: Following an internal rift over a Pentagon project that would possibly use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to survey the landscape, Sundar Pichai released a set of ethical guidelines to streamline and limit the use of AI, and Google’s AI services. Conclusions: I. AI could be of great help to the military. II. Google is risking an all-out bot war, with their development of AI.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusion, Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, Statements: I. All pages are yellow. II. All yellow are newspapers. III. Some newspapers are national. Conclusions: I. Some national are yellow II. Some newspapers are pages. III. No page is national.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)