In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer. Statement: The officer insulted Rajeev in the presence of his colleagues. Conclusions: I. The officer did not like Rajeev. II. Rajeev was not well-known with his colleagues.?

Option 3 : Neither I nor II follows.

The reason for the officer insulting Rajeev  cannot be inferred from the given statement.

It cannot be concluded that the officer did not like Rajeev. Professionally there are more chances of the officer insulting Rajeev due to certain negligence in his duties. But we have no proof of that. So, conclusion I does not follow. 

Similarly, conclusion II also does not follow, as the statement does not give any proof of the officer (or the rest of the staff) not liking Rajeev.

Thus, neither conclusion I nor II follows. The correct answer is option (3).