Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: Some eagles are kites. All kites are birds Conclusions: 1. Some birds are eagles. 2. Some eagles are birds.?

Neither 1 nor 2 follows.
Only conclusion 1 follows
Only conclusion 2 follows.
Both 1 and 2 follow.

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : Both 1 and 2 follow.

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,

[ alt="10-Aug Shift 2 D19" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/04/10-Aug_Shift%202_D19.PNG" style="width: 171px; height: 100px;">

Conclusions:

1. Some birds are eagles → true.

2. Some eagles are birds → true.

Thus, both the conclusions follow.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All eggs are hens. All hens are birds. All birds are crows. Conclusions: I. All eggs are crows. II. All hens are crows. III. Some crows are birds.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Below are given statements. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: Some shorts are jackets. Some jackets are bags. No bag is large. Some large are kites. Conclusions: 1) Some jackets are not large. 2) Some jackets are not bag. 3) Some kites are bag.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the below question, some statements are given. You have to take the given statements true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: All animals are birds. Some birds are dogs. Some dogs are jugs. No jug is bug. Conclusions: 1) Some birds are animals. 2) Some dogs are animals. 3) Some dogs are not bugs. 4) Some dogs are not animals.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Below are given statements followed by four conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: All insects are birds. Some birds are tissues. Some tissues are elements. No element is science. Conclusions: I. No science is tissue. II. Some science are tissue. III. Some tissues are insects. IV. Some elements are birds.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Below are given four statements followed by four conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: Some wings are large. All large are birds. Some birds are kites. Some kites are not big. Conclusions: I. Some wings are birds. II. Some kites are birds. III. Some birds are large. IV. All wings can be large.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All kites are flight. II. Some birds are kites. Conclusions: I. Some birds are flight. II. No flight is birds.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All trees are birds. Some birds are river. Some rivers are sea. Conclusions: I. Some seas are tree. II. Some rivers are birds.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: Some birds are animals. No animal is an insect. Conclusions: I. All birds being insects is a possibility. II. Some insects are birds.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. After a Pay Commission bonanza of 2% hike in dearness allowance in March, central government employees and pensioners can expect another round of salary increase with the government set to modify the index and base year for calculating dearness allowance. II. The labour ministry is working on a new series of consumer price index for industrial workers (CPI-IW), which is used to determine dearness allowance (DA). Conclusions: I. DA is a cost of living adjustment allowance paid to government employees, public sector employees and pensioners in the country. It is calculated as a percentage of an employee’s basic salary to mitigate the impact of inflation on people. II. Since theindex is used to determine dearness allowance of all government employees and industrial workers there may be significant financial implication. III. The trend so far is that the weightage of transport, healthcare and housing has gone up many fold in the new series in the monthly expenditure of an industrial worker, especially consumption of petrol and diesel with the addition of cars to it, while there is decline in overall food basket which is being diversified.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Two statements are followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has sought information on offshore investments by directors of RNT Associates, a closely held firm which functions as a family office and investment vehicle of Ratan Tata. II. The ED order, dated June 14, also calls for details of investments or loans from RNT Associates and its directors to a Singapore-based entity, RNT Associates Ltd. Conclusions: The order is under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the documents are being sought for the purpose of investigation under FEMA. The nature of queries from Enforcement Directorate is related to RNT Associates’ investment portfolio. It is compliant with all disclosures and existing laws governing investments and is extending all cooperation.?

1 Answers 7 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)