1 Answers
Option 1 : 1 and 2 only
- On 23 November 1949, Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar, while making of the constitution said about the role of supreme court - “While there can be no two opinions on the need for the maintenance of judicial independence, ...it is also necessary to keep in view one important principle. The doctrine of independence is not to be raised to the level of a dogma so as to enable the judiciary to function as a kind of super-legislature or super executive. The judiciary is there to interpret the Constitution or adjudicate upon the rights...”
- The Indian Constitution depends on a fragile standard of the restricted detachment of power and checks and balances. This implies every organ of the administration has an unmistakable region of working. Along these lines, the Parliament is preeminent in making laws and altering or amending the Constitution, the executive or official is incomparable in actualizing them while the legal executive is preeminent in settling questions and choosing whether the laws that have been made are as per the arrangements of the Constitution.
- In spite of such obvious division of intensity, the contention between the Parliament and judiciary, and executive and judiciary has remained an intermittent subject in Indian governmental issues.
5 views
Answered