1 Answers

Option 1 : Only II follows.

Course of Action I does not provide a solution to the problem. Demolishing cinema halls is not a solution which can counter the threat of OTT platforms denting their profitability.

Hence, Course of Action I does not follow.

Let’s evaluate Course of Action II.

It is a viable action and will serve as a warning to producers who are directly releasing on OTT platforms. Since, despite repeated requests, producers are not heeding to the calls of Cinema Halls not to release on OTT platforms, a strong warning signal needs to be given and Course of Action II is an action in that direction.

Hence, Course of Action II follows.

Course of Action III is not a solution because the Government cannot impede upon the freedom of film-viewers to watch films or the freedom of Film producers and OTT platforms to conduct business as per their market perceptions. Also, the profitability of Cinema Halls cannot be placed above public health and freedom.

Hence, Course of Action III does not follow.

So, only Course of Action II follows.

4 views

Related Questions