1 Answers

Option 5 : None follows

The given statement is about the India’s aviation regulator considering a change in the way on-time performance (OTP) of airlines is calculated, a move that will benefit passengers whose flights take off belatedly (later than the usual time) due to weather and other issues. 

A course of action is something that needs to be done considering the present scenario in mind.

Course of action (I) is not any course of action and is rather a general statement in context of the change, the move will bring. Thus, it is eliminated.

Course of action (II) brings out the response of the airline industry, thus, it can be assumed to be course of action taken by the industry in response to the move. But, since a course of action must be done in regard to the given problem, this action has already been done and thus, can be rejected.

Course of action (III) is not a course of action rather is a general statement regarding the impact of the move. Thus, it is rejected.

As none of the course of action is relevant thus, the correct answer is option 5.
4 views

Related Questions