Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs Arguments : I. No. It will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment. II. Yes. It creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely. III. No. This goes against the basic rights of the individuals. IV. Yes. This will increase productivity.?

LohaHridoy
  1. Only I and III are strong
  2. All are strong
  3. Only II and IV are strong
  4. Only III is strong
  5. None of these

0 like 0 dislike
3 views
Share with your friends

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Call

Answer: Option 4

The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere related to increase in unemployment, as the number of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a working place, it is the performance of the individual that matters and that makes him more or less wanted, and not his educational qualifications. So, neither I nor II holds strong. Besides, the needs of a job are laid down in the desired qualifications for the job. So, recruitment of more qualified people cannot augment productivity. Thus, IV also does not hold strong. However, it is the right of an individual to get the post for which he fulfils the eligibility criteria, whatever be his extra merits. Hence, argument III holds strong.

0 like 0 dislike
3 views
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced Arguments : I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world. II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.?

Answer: Option 2 Argument I is not strong because we should not copy other country. But II is strong because on reducing the number of holidays, the working time will...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the educated people work in villages Arguments : I. Yes, because they can revolutionize agriculture and revamp rural atmosphere. II. No, the educated should be employed in cities only otherwise their education will go waste.?

Answer: Option 1 By working of educated people in villages, their education will not be wasted but their will be the proper use of their education. On account of their...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should individuals/institutes having treasures of national significance like Nobel Prizes, hand them over to the Central Government for their safe custody Arguments : I. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them. II. No. These are the property of the individuals/institutions who win them and should be in their custody.?

Answer: Option 2 Clearly, the awards are given for individual excellence and perfection. So, only argument II holds strong.

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the school teachers be debarred from giving private tuitions Arguments : I. No. The needy students will be deprived of the expertise of these teachers. II. Yes. This is an injustice to the unemployed educated people who can earn their living by giving tuitions. III. Yes. Only then the quality of teaching in schools will improve. IV. Yes. Now salary of these teachers is reasonable.?

Answer: Option 5 Only III is strong. The lure of earning private tuitions reduces the efforts and devotion of the teachers towards the students in schools. So, if tuitions are...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the public sector undertakings be kilo wed to adopt hire and fire policy Arguments : I. Yes. This will help the public sector undertakings to get rid of non-performing employees and reward the performing employees. II. No. This will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately. III. Yes. This will help increase the level of efficiency of these organizations and these will become profitable establishments.?

Answer: Option 4 'Hire and fire policy' implies 'taking up the performing employees and discarding the non-performing ones'. Clearly, such a policy would stand out to encourage employees to work...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only few banks in place of numerous smaller banks in India Arguments : I. Yes. This will help secure the investor's money as these big banks will be able to withstand intermittent market related shocks. II. No. A large number of people will lose their jobs as after the merger many employees will be redundant. III. Yes. This will help consolidate the entire banking industry and will lead to healthy competition.?

Answer: Option 1 The security of the investor's money is not related to the size of the bank. Besides even after consolidation, the number of investors, their amounts and hence...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the number of holidays of government employees be reduced Arguments : I. Yes. Our government employees are having the maximum number of holidays among the countries of the world. II. Yes. It is a sign of British legacy, why should we carry it further III. Yes. It will speed up work and all the pending jobs can be completed well in time. IV. No. Employees must be given ample spare time to spend with their family.?

Answer: Option 2 Reducing the number of holidays just because no other country gives so many holidays or it is a feature of a certain system which we have renounced,...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the government ban all forms of protests including strikes and processions Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to teach discipline to the employees. II. No. Government cannot deprive its citizens of their basic rights. III. Yes. This is the only way to ensure maximum productivity without disruption of work.?

Answer: Option 3 Clearly, strike is not a means of indiscipline but only a practice in which the workers exercise their fundamental right to voice their protest against the atrocities...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should seniority be the only criterion for the promotion Arguments : I. No. It would be an injustice to those juniors who are more deserving and suitable for higher positions than their senior counterparts. II. Yes. Otherwise senior employees do feel humiliated. III. Yes. Senior employees are more experienced and must be rewarded for the same.?

Answer: Option 2 In an organization, what matters most is productivity and to ensure productivity, the organization needs to have effective managers and innovative, devoted and hard-working employees. Thus, the...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should workers/employees be allowed to participate in the management of factories in India Arguments : I. Yes. It is the present management theory. II. No. Many workers are illiterate and so their contributions will not be of any value. III. Yes. Employees-owned companies generally have higher productivity. IV. No. Employee-union ownership drives up salaries and wages.?

Answer: Option 3 Argument I in support does not provide a valid reason for the pursuance of the policy. So, it is vague. Argument II provides a valid reason, as...

1 Answers 1 views
X