- None is strong
- Only I and II are strong
- Only II and III are strong
- Only I and III are strong
- All are strong
1 Answers
Call
Answer: Option 1
The security of the investor's money is not related to the size of the bank. Besides even after consolidation, the number of investors, their amounts and hence the duties shall remain the same and so no employees will be redundant. Reducing the number of smaller banks will also not affect the mutual competition among the banks. Thus, none of the arguments holds strong.
0
like
0 dislike
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to sustain present rate of technological development in India. II. No. The Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve. III. No. The practical knowledge gained by Indians by working in other countries help India develop its economy.?
Answer: Option 1 Clearly, none of the arguments provides a substantial reason either for or against the given statements. So, none of the arguments holds strong.
1 Answers 2 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only one rate of interest for term deposits of varying durations in banks Arguments : I. No, People will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks. II. Yes. This will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.?
Answer: Option 1 The proposed scheme would discourage people from keeping deposit for longer durations and not draw in more funds. So, only argument I holds.
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be a ceiling on the salary of top executives of multinationals in our country Arguments : I. Yes. Otherwise it would lead to unhealthy competition and our own industry would not be able to withstand that. II. No. With the accent on liberalization of economy, any such move would be counter-productive. Once the economy picks up, this disparity will be reduced.?
Answer: Option 5 In the absence of such a ceiling, the companies would be involved in a mutual competition of salaries, in a bid to attract the most competent professionals....
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in future Arguments : I. No. There is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle. II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.?
Answer: Option 2 Oil, being an essential commodity, our country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is vague, while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should trade unions be banned completely Arguments : I. Yes. Workers can concentrate on production. II. No. This is the only way through which employees can put their demands before the management. III. Yes. Employees get their illegal demands fulfilled through these unions. IV. No. Trade unions are not banned in other economically advanced countries.?
Answer: Option 2 Clearly, trade unions provide a common platform for the workers to voice their demands and protests and thus ensure that they are not subdued or exploited. So,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the public sector undertakings be kilo wed to adopt hire and fire policy Arguments : I. Yes. This will help the public sector undertakings to get rid of non-performing employees and reward the performing employees. II. No. This will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately. III. Yes. This will help increase the level of efficiency of these organizations and these will become profitable establishments.?
Answer: Option 4 'Hire and fire policy' implies 'taking up the performing employees and discarding the non-performing ones'. Clearly, such a policy would stand out to encourage employees to work...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the income generated out of agricultural activities be taxed Arguments : I. No. Farmers are otherwise suffering from natural calamities and low yield coupled with low procurement price and their income should not be taxed. II. Yes. Majority of the population is dependent on agriculture and hence their income should be taxed to augment the resources. III. Yes. Many big farmers earn much more than the majority of the service earners and they should be taxed to remove the disparity.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, if the income of farmers is not adequate, they cannot be brought under the net of taxation as per rules governing the Income Tax Act. So,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the number of holidays of government employees be reduced Arguments : I. Yes. Our government employees are having the maximum number of holidays among the countries of the world. II. Yes. It is a sign of British legacy, why should we carry it further III. Yes. It will speed up work and all the pending jobs can be completed well in time. IV. No. Employees must be given ample spare time to spend with their family.?
Answer: Option 2 Reducing the number of holidays just because no other country gives so many holidays or it is a feature of a certain system which we have renounced,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all those who are convicted for heinous crimes like murder or rape, beyond all reasonable doubts be given capital punishment or death penalty Arguments : I. No. The death penalty should be given only in very rare and exceptional cases. II. Yes. This is the only way to punish such people who take others' lives or indulge in inhuman activities. III. Yes. Such severe punishments only will make people refrain from such heinous acts and the society will be safer. IV. No. Those who are repentant for the crime they committed should be given a chance to improve and lead a normal life.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, a person committing a heinous crime like murder or rape should be so punished as to set an example for others not to attempt such acts...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the profit making public sector units be sold to private companies Arguments : I. Yes. This will help the government to augment its resources for implementing the development programmes. II. No. The private companies will not be able to run these units effectively. III. Yes. There will be a significant improvement in the quality of services. IV. No. There would not be job security for the employees at all the levels.?
Answer: Option 3 The government cannot sell off public sector units just to pool up funds for development. Besides, if it does so, these units shall be handed over to...
1 Answers 1 views