The AI system developed by researchers at University College London and Babylon Health relies on causation rather than correlation to pinpoint what could be wrong with people, unlike pre-existing AI systems. The new AI system is more accurate and even outperformed real-life doctors in a small, controlled trial. Hence it is more accurate than pre-existing AI systems and even outperformed real-life doctors in a small, controlled trial. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above sentences?
The AI system developed by researchers at University College London and Babylon Health relies on causation rather than correlation to pinpoint what could be wrong with people, unlike pre-existing AI systems. The new AI system is more accurate and even outperformed real-life doctors in a small, controlled trial. Hence it is more accurate than pre-existing AI systems and even outperformed real-life doctors in a small, controlled trial. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above sentences? Correct Answer <div>In order to find out what is wrong with a patient, it is better not to depend on AI systems that rely on correlation.</div>
The correct answer is option 2.
Explanation:
Let us look at the relevance of each and every option as per the lines given in the question.
- Option 1 is merely a restatement and not an inference.
- Option 3 is also a restatement.
- Option 4 is not an inference as sufficient data is not provided. The causal AI system was tested in a small, controlled trial where it outperformed real doctors. This doesn't mean that it will be able to outperform doctors in any given scenario.
- Option 2 is the correct answer. It is said in the passage that the new AI system relies on causation and not correlation and it is more accurate than pre-existing AI systems. From this, we can conclude option 2.
Hence, only option 2 can be inferred from the given sentences.