Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In a certain code language, "doors are black" is written as "or ae lk", "human are mortal" is written as "ae rt ma" and "black is dark" is written as "dr kk lk". How is "doors" written in that code language?

In a certain code language, "doors are black" is written as "or ae lk", "human are mortal" is written as "ae rt ma" and "black is dark" is written as "dr kk lk". How is "doors" written in that code language? Correct Answer or

According to the information given in the question we get the following diagram,

[ alt="SSC JE Prakash 7 Jan 20 50 Q (AutoRecovered) zahida D2" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/20/02/SSC_JE_Prakash_7_Jan_20_50_Q_%28AutoRecovered%29_zahida_D2.PNG" style="width: 352px; height: 172px;">

Hence, doors will be coded as ‘or’

Related Questions

If 'All men are mortal' is given as True, then which of the following options can be validly inferred from it? A. 'No men is mortal' is False B. 'Some men are mortal' is True C. 'Some men are not mortal' is True D. 'Some men are not mortal' is False E. 'Some men are mortal' is False Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Match List I with List II List I List II Typical Aristotelian syllogism  Technical names in  Nyaya Philosophy  A. Socrates in mortal  I. Nigamana  B. Because he is a man  II. Upanaya  C. Whoever is a man, is mortal  e.g. Pythagoras  III. Udaharan  D. Socrates is a man who is  invariably a mortal  IV. Hetu  E. Therefore Socrates is mortal  V. Pratijna Choose the correct answer from the options given below: 
Statements : All rods are bricks. Some bricks are ropes. All ropes are doors.

Conclusions :
I. Some rods are doors.
II. Some doors are bricks.
III. Some rods are not doors.
IV. All doors are ropes.
"Too often we try to solve human problem with non-human tools and in terms of non-human data. It is my simple thesis that a human problem requires a human solution. First we have to learn to recognise a human problem when we see one; and second, upon recognising it, we have to learn to deal with it as such and not as it were something else. A human problem to be brought to a human solution requires human data and human tools". Who said this?
Which of the following is the correct sequence in the development of geographic thought? (A) Greeks, Roman, Arabs, Dark Ages (B) Greeks, Roman, Dark Ages, Arabs (C) Roman, Greeks, Arabs, Dark Ages (D) Arabs, Greeks, Roman, Dark Ages  (E) Greeks, Dark ages, Roman, Arabs Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
If 'All men are mortal' is true, what can be inferred about the truth or falsehood of the following propositions?
1. Some non-mortals are not non-men.
2. No non-men are non-mortal.
3. Some non-mortal are men.
Out of these statements
In a certain code language, 'it is dark outside' is written as 'ha no ti ju','is it still raining' is written as 'pa ha da no', 'go and play outside' is written as 'su ju ye la'. How is 'dark' written in that code language?
In the question given below, there are three statements followed by three conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements. Statements: All windows are doors. All buildings are doors. All doors are boats. Conclusions: I. All windows are boats. II. All buildings are boats. III. Some boats are doors.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements:  Some pillows are doors. Some doors are beds. Conclusions: I. Some doors are pillows. II. All beds are doors.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1. All doors are teachers. 2. All teachers are cups. Conclusions: I. All cups are doors. II. All doors are cups. III. All teachers are doors. IV. Some cups are teachers.