A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: No evidence could be gathered from the crime scene, said CBI. Inferences: Culprits will never get caught. Culprit has not left any evidence anywhere.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: No evidence could be gathered from the crime scene, said CBI. Inferences: Culprits will never get caught. Culprit has not left any evidence anywhere. Correct Answer <p>Neither I nor II follows.</p> <p> </p>
The fact that there was no evidence on the crime scene does not mean there was no evidence anywhere. Thus, inference II does not follow. And as the investigation is not yet complete, we cannot say if the culprit will get caught or not, so, inference I does not follow.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025