Which of the following statements is/are correct, with reference to Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone? 1. It is a low-pressure zone located at the equator where Trade Winds converge. 2. In this zone, air tends to descend. 3. In July, it is located around 200 N-250 N latitudes.  Which of the following statements given above is/are correct?

Which of the following statements is/are correct, with reference to Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone? 1. It is a low-pressure zone located at the equator where Trade Winds converge. 2. In this zone, air tends to descend. 3. In July, it is located around 200 N-250 N latitudes.  Which of the following statements given above is/are correct? Correct Answer 1 and 3 only

The correct answer is 1 and 3 only.

Important Points

  • The Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) is a low-pressure zone located at the equator where trade winds converge, and so, it is a zone where air tends to ascend. Hence statement 1 is correct and 2 is not correct.

Key Points

  • In July, the ITCZ is located around 20o N 250 N latitudes (over the Gangetic plain), sometimes called the monsoon trough. Hence statement 3 is correct.
    • This monsoon trough encourages the development of thermal low over north and northwest India.
  • Due to the shift of ITCZ due to the apparent movement of the sun, the trade winds of the southern hemisphere cross the equator between 400 and 600 E longitudes and start blowing from southwest to northeast due to the Coriolis force.
    • It becomes southwest monsoon.
  • In winter, the ITCZ moves southward, and so the reversal of winds from northeast to south and southwest takes place.
    • They are called northeast monsoons.

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The United States has launched what China calls the ‘largest trade war in economic history' and in its latest move targeted another $200 billion in Chinese export goods. The US-China spat is one of several trade fights picked by the protectionist President Donald Trump as his ‘America First' agenda disrupts trade relations among traditional allies. The growing share of international trade under threat has raised the prospect the escalating trade war could harm the global economy, shrinking investments and undermining supply chains. Why? Arguments: I. Several companies - including Total and Peugeot of France, and Russia's Lukoil - have said they are preparing to exit Iran ahead of US deadlines, the last of which is November 4. II. Trump argued the original deal from 2012 was lopsided in Seoul's favour but has also clouded the issue by appearing to link trade concessions to progress in his separate track of talks with nuclear-armed North Korea. III. Meanwhile, talks among the three NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) signatories, launched after Trump demanded an overhaul of the ‘terrible deal', have snagged notably owing to the US demands to increase American content installed in duty-free autos.