A kidney can be taken safely from a living person, and can save the life of a dying patient. Given that the demand for kidney transplants exceeds the supply of donated kidneys, the law in the India that forbids people to sell one of their kidneys should be abolished, because this would result in a greater number of successful kidney transplants. People are worried that it would involve rich patients exploiting poor potential donors. But selling one's kidney to support one's family is not very much different from supporting one's family by working in a dangerous occupation. Some patients have bought kidneys and received transplants in other countries, where the risks to their life from such operations can be great. Select an assumption supporting the above argument from following options.
A kidney can be taken safely from a living person, and can save the life of a dying patient. Given that the demand for kidney transplants exceeds the supply of donated kidneys, the law in the India that forbids people to sell one of their kidneys should be abolished, because this would result in a greater number of successful kidney transplants. People are worried that it would involve rich patients exploiting poor potential donors. But selling one's kidney to support one's family is not very much different from supporting one's family by working in a dangerous occupation. Some patients have bought kidneys and received transplants in other countries, where the risks to their life from such operations can be great. Select an assumption supporting the above argument from following options. Correct Answer Some people in India are willing to sell a kidney.
The correct answer is 'Some people in India are willing to sell a kidney.'.
Key Points
Let's look at the following mentioned points-
- The given context is regarding- Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation and transplantation.
- It notifies 'the issues associated with Kidney transplantation of people who suffers form the mentioned entities i.e. -
- The law in India should be abolished that forbids people to sell one of their kidneys as it would result in induce in a greater number of successful Kidney transplants for the needy one.
- It is mentioned that some people are worried that it would involve rich patients exploiting poor potential donor selling; though to support one's family with Kidney transplantation is not very much different from supporting one's family by working in a dangerous occupation which implies that people in India are amenable to sell a kidney (in terms of supporting).
- Thus from the above mentioned two points we can infer that option 2 would be the most appropriate assumption of the given argument.
Let's look at the following points- - Option 1 is incorrect as in the passage it is mentioned that 'People are worried that it would involve rich patients exploiting poor potential donors' , it implies that poor people are worried in the process of '' as they threatened with the thought that they would be exploited by rich patients.
- Option 3 is incorrect as in the passage it is mentioned that the receiving and transplanting process occurs in different countries which leads to a greater risk.
- Option 4 is incorrect as it is mentioned to abolish (put an end to) the law not to change the law.