Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: A civil officer was stabbed to death in Mirpur. Inferences: I. Civil officer had indulged in a fight with someone. II. Civil officer was walking alone at night when the incident took place.

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: A civil officer was stabbed to death in Mirpur. Inferences: I. Civil officer had indulged in a fight with someone. II. Civil officer was walking alone at night when the incident took place. Correct Answer <p>Neither I nor II follows.</p>

As the conditions in which the incident took place is not specified, we cannot say if the officer indulged in a fight with someone or not, or if he was alone or not or if it was daytime or night. Therefore, neither inference I nor II follows.

Related Questions

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: People with flu generate infectious aerosols (tiny droplets that stay suspended in the air for a long time) even when they are not coughing, and especially during the first days of illness. Inferences: I: Infected people can spread the disease just by breathing. II: Infected persons should stay at home rather than going to workplaces even when they're not coughing.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: Leading electronics company offered their employees a free and unlimited supply of Redbull for 3 days. Inferences: I. They had to meet a deadline which needed the employees to work without too many breaks. II. The company had a promotional tie-up with Redbull.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.   Statement: Punjab is very proud of Diljit Dosanjh. Even though he wears a turban, he has made a place for himself in the film industry. Inferences: I: People with turban found it difficult to be a part of the film industry. II: Diljit Dosanjh is an inspiration for Punjabis.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: There goes a saying, “Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder”. Inferences: Blind people do not have any perception of beauty. Different people have different notions of beauty.  
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: Bouchard may have crashed out in the third round of the 2018 Australian Open, but she has an army of fans at Melbourne. Inferences: I: People of Melbourne don't like any other player. II: She has her fans only in Melbourne.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.   Statement: Bad fielding and the inability of batsmen to adjust to conditions led to the Virat Kohli-led Indian cricket team’s Test series loss. Inferences: I: If the bowling had been better, the Indian team would've won. II: This is not the only tournament where the team lost because of bad fielding.  
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: CBSE revised the exam timetable on 19th January after its initial release on 10th January. Inferences: I: The exam timetable had some flaws in it. II: This year’s timetable is better than the previous year’s timetable.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: Mr. Prasad went bankrupt. Inferences: Mr. Prasad had insufficient assets to cover his debts. Mr. Prasad lost all his money in gambling.  
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: President Donald Trump said in his State of the Union address to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday that he wants lawmakers to support the “right to try” for terminally ill patients to try experimental therapies not approved by federal authorities. Inferences: It is currently not allowed in the US for ill patients to undergo any medical treatment not approved by federal authorities. Allowing the “right to try” for terminally ill patients would provide immunity to doctors and medical practitioners who would be administering the treatment not approved by federal authorities.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: South Africa’s Cape Town could run out of water by April as the city’s worst drought in a century might be forcing residents to join queues for emergency rations. Inferences: I: People will avoid settling in Cape Town in the coming years. II: People living in Cape Town might consider moving out of there.