A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: WHO declared India a polio free nation. Inferences: I. No cases of polio have been reported in the past two decades in India. II. Vaccine programs for polio should be stopped.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: WHO declared India a polio free nation. Inferences: I. No cases of polio have been reported in the past two decades in India. II. Vaccine programs for polio should be stopped. Correct Answer <p>Neither I nor II follows.</p>
As we don’t know how many years a nation has to maintain its polio free standard to qualify as a polio free nation and two decades is a long time, we can say that inference I does not follow. Similarly, if we don’t want polio to reemerge we should keep our child getting vaccinated. This means vaccine programs for polio should not be stopped. So, neither inference I nor II follows.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025