In the following question, a given question is followed by information in three statements. You have to decide the data in which statement(s) is/are sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. There are eight persons in the family – Ajay, Aman, Dhruv, Dipali, Kanchan, Manan, Nandini and Urvi. What is the relation between Dipali and Ajay? I. Kanchan is wife of Manan and she has one daughter whose name is Dipali. II. Nandini is the grandmother of Ajay who is the son of Aman. III. Dhruv and Urvi are father and mother respectively of Manan who is the brother-in-law of Aman.

In the following question, a given question is followed by information in three statements. You have to decide the data in which statement(s) is/are sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. There are eight persons in the family – Ajay, Aman, Dhruv, Dipali, Kanchan, Manan, Nandini and Urvi. What is the relation between Dipali and Ajay? I. Kanchan is wife of Manan and she has one daughter whose name is Dipali. II. Nandini is the grandmother of Ajay who is the son of Aman. III. Dhruv and Urvi are father and mother respectively of Manan who is the brother-in-law of Aman. Correct Answer All the statements are required

Using the following notations, we can draw the family tree,

[ alt="RRB OA MFT8 RRBOA 18 Aug 2018 40Q images Q38" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/09/RRB_OA_MFT8_RRBOA_18_Aug_2018_40Q_images_Q38.PNG">

From statement I and II,

[ alt="RRB OA MFT8 RRBOA 18 Aug 2018 40Q images Q38a" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/09/RRB_OA_MFT8_RRBOA_18_Aug_2018_40Q_images_Q38a.PNG" style="height:149px; width:334px">

The relation between Dipali and Ajay is not given. Therefore, Statement I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.

From statement II and III,

[ alt="RRB OA MFT8 RRBOA 18 Aug 2018 40Q images Q38b" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/09/RRB_OA_MFT8_RRBOA_18_Aug_2018_40Q_images_Q38b.PNG" style="height:169px; width:324px">

The relation between Dipali and Ajay is not given. Therefore, Statement II and III together are not sufficient to answer the question.

From statement I and III,

[ alt="RRB OA MFT8 RRBOA 18 Aug 2018 40Q images Q38c" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/09/RRB_OA_MFT8_RRBOA_18_Aug_2018_40Q_images_Q38c.PNG" style="height:157px; width:319px">

The relation between Dipali and Ajay is not given. Therefore, Statement I and III together are not sufficient to answer the question.

Combining all the statements,

[ alt="RRB OA MFT8 RRBOA 18 Aug 2018 40Q images Q38d" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/18/09/RRB_OA_MFT8_RRBOA_18_Aug_2018_40Q_images_Q38d.PNG">

Clearly Dipali and Ajay are cousins.

Hence, all the statements are required.

Related Questions

Study the following information carefully and answer the given questions. For a recruitment process in an ACCOUNTING organization, the candidates need to possess the following qualifications criteria: i) He/she must be a graduate in commerce with at least 60% marks. ii) He/she must be at least 24 years of age and not more than 40 years as of 1-7-2016. iii) He/she must have post-qualification work experience of at least 2 years. iv) He/she should have secured 55% marks in the selection process. However, if the candidate fulfills the above-mentioned criteria except: (A) at (i), and if the candidate is not a graduate in commerce but has a post-graduation degree in finance with a minimum of 60% marks, he/she should be referred to the Finance Manager of the organization. (B) at (iii), and if the candidate fulfills all the eligibility criteria of post-qualification work experience but has secured 75% marks in the selection process, he/she may be referred to the Trainee Accountant. Based on the above information, study carefully whether the following candidates are eligible for the recruitment process and mark your answer as follows. You are not to assume anything other than the information provided in each question. All the cases are given to you as of 1-7-2016. Snehlata’s date of birth is 6.2.1990. She has done her graduation and post-graduation in Commerce and secured 61% and 63% marks respectively. She has post-qualification work experience as a Senior Accountant of 3.5 years. She has secured 58.5% marks in the selection process.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: India’s telecom watchdog has suggested regulation of all entities dealing with consumer data—devices such as iPhones, operating systems such as Android, browsers like Google’s Chrome and apps such as Facebook, Paytm, Uber or Zomato— by bringing them under licence conditions that apply to telecom service providers until a general data protection law is put in place by the government. Which of the following argument weakens the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) said the framework for protection of personal information is ‘not sufficient’ and that the issue of data ownership, privacy, and security is complex and multi-dimensional. It suggested expanding the ambit of licence conditions governing telcos to all entities handling customer information and empowerment of customers to keep their data secure. II. The telecom watchdog further said that individual users owned their data, or personal information, and entities such as devices were ‘mere custodians’ and do not have primary rights over that information. III. Telcos and internet service providers (ISPs) though welcomed recommendations that sought to bring app makers under the same regulations. However, content providers have been opposed to being brought under more regulation.