An oil painting by late Chinese-French artist Zao Wou-Ki became the most expensive oil painting ever sold at auction by an Asian artist. The painting fetched $65 million in the auction at Sotheby’s Hong Kong. Which of the following do not support the statement? I: The oil painting by late Chinese-French artist became the most expensive oil painting ever sold at auction. II: The auction at Sotheby’s Hong Kong on the painting fetched $65 million which is the highest till date for any artist. III: Zao Wou-Ki was an Asian artist who ever sold the most expensive oil painting.
An oil painting by late Chinese-French artist Zao Wou-Ki became the most expensive oil painting ever sold at auction by an Asian artist. The painting fetched $65 million in the auction at Sotheby’s Hong Kong. Which of the following do not support the statement? I: The oil painting by late Chinese-French artist became the most expensive oil painting ever sold at auction. II: The auction at Sotheby’s Hong Kong on the painting fetched $65 million which is the highest till date for any artist. III: Zao Wou-Ki was an Asian artist who ever sold the most expensive oil painting. Correct Answer <span style="font-family:open sans,sans-serif">Only I and II</span>
Only I and II. Because Zao Wou-Ki was an Asian artist to ever sold the most expensive oil painting. So, I and II together do not support the statement. Hence option 3 is the answer.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025