In January 2020, Sri Lankan Foreign Minister reached New Delhi on a two-day official visit to India. Who is the Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka?

In January 2020, Sri Lankan Foreign Minister reached New Delhi on a two-day official visit to India. Who is the Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka? Correct Answer Dinesh Gunawardena

  • Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena reached New Delhi on 8 Jan 2020 on a two-day official visit to India.
  • He had a delegation-level meeting with External affairs minister Dr S. Jaishankar on 9 Jan 2020.
  • Cooperation in economic projects, investment by Indian companies, issue of fishermen and stability in the Indian Ocean region were the main issues discussed by the two leaders.
  • Sri Lanka: Capital - Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte (Administrative Capital), Colombo (Commercial capital)
    Currency - Sri Lankan rupee

Related Questions

Which of the following pair is NOT correctly matched? (Official Visit) (Year) (1) Indian Foreign Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s visit to China 1989 (B) Indian Prime Minister Rajeev Gandhi’s visit to China 1988 (C) Chinese Prime Minister Li Peng’s Visit to India 1992 (D) Chinese President Jiang Zemin’s Visit to India 1996
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.