Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In this question, three statements and then three conclusions are given. Assuming the statement is the whole truth, then decide together with the findings that decide which conclusions are undoubtedly logical based on the information given in the statement.   Statement: Some lines are columns. There are some column layouts. There are all layers of wood. Conclusion: i) Some columns are wood. ii) There are some lines of wood. iii) There is no line of wood.

In this question, three statements and then three conclusions are given. Assuming the statement is the whole truth, then decide together with the findings that decide which conclusions are undoubtedly logical based on the information given in the statement.   Statement: Some lines are columns. There are some column layouts. There are all layers of wood. Conclusion: i) Some columns are wood. ii) There are some lines of wood. iii) There is no line of wood. Correct Answer Either ii) or iii) is logical

i) Some columns are wood. → False (It can be possible but it is not definite)

ii) There are some lines of wood. → False (It can be possible but it is not definite)

iii) There is no line of wood. → False (It can be possible but it is not definite)

But ii) and iii) forms a complementary pair.

Hence, either ii) or iii) is logical.

Related Questions

In this question, there are two statements and two conclusions i and ii. Assuming the statement is the whole truth, then decide both conclusions together, and decide which conclusions are undoubtedly logical based on the information given in the statement.   Statement: All male are sons. All the boys are male. Conclusion: i. All the boys are sons. ii. There are some male sons. Choose the correct option from the next A) only the conclusion is true. B) Only conclusions ii is true. C) Conclusion i or ii is true. D) Both i or ii ar e not true. E) i and ii are both true
Assuming that the statements given in the statements to be true are to be considered together at both the conclusions and to make sure that the information given in the statement Which of the conclusions beyond reasonable doubt is logical? Statements: All teak are banyan. All banyan are wood. Conclusions: i) All wood are teak. ii) Some banyan are teak. Select from the following options, A) only conclusions i is logical. B) The only conclusion ii is logical. C) Either i or ii conclusion is logical. D) neither i nor ii conclusion is ration al. D) i and ii both conclusions are rational.
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
According to Gandhiji, truth complies to which of the following?
In this question two statements and two related findings have been given in the form of i and ii. Assuming each thing given in the statements as true, considering both the findings together, to make sure that the information given in the statements Which of the conclusions in relation to them is reasonable without any reasonable doubt? Statement: All the rings are crowns. All crowns are linen. Conclusion: i). All the rings are linen. ii). Some linen are rings. Select the one most suitable in the following options: A. The only conclusion i is logical is B. only the conclusions ii is logical C. Either the conclusions i or ii is rational D. i and ii both conclusions are rational.
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
According to the passage, which of the following statement is not true?
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
What are the twin cardinal principles of Gandhis thought?
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
According to Gandhiji, what is the most powerful force in existence?
A statement in this question and the two conclusions related to them are given in the form of i and ii, assuming that the statements given in the statements to be true are to be considered together on both the findings and to make sure that the information given in the statement Which of the conclusions beyond reasonable doubt is logical? Statement: Every Monday is a working day. Today is a working day. Conclusion: i. Today is Monday. ii. Only Monday is a working day. Choose the right one from the following options: A) The only conclusion is rational. B) The only conclusion ii is logical. C) either i or ii conclusion is rational. D) neither i nor ii conclusion is rational. E) i and ii both conclusions are rational.
In this question, after two statements i and ii two conclusions have been given. Assuming the given in the statement together as truth, consider both the findings together and decide on which one of them follows beyond the logical and appropriate scepticism based on the information given in the statement. Statement: Some papers are pen. All pencils are pen. Conclusion: i) Some pencils are papers ii) Some pen are pencils (A) Only conclusion i follows (B) Only conclusion ii follows (C) Either I or II follows (D) Neither I nor II follows (E) I and II both follow
In this question, a statement and related two findings have been given in the form of i and ii. Considering each thing given in the statement as true, considering both the findings together, to make sure that the information given in the statement Which of the conclusions in relation to them is reasonable without any reasonable doubt? Statement: John, a German philosopher, is a good mathematician. Conclusion: i). John is a German. ii). All German philosophers are mathematicians. Select the one most suitable in the following options: A. The only conclusion i is logical is B. only the conclusions ii is logical C. Either the conclusions i or ii is rational D. Neither conclusion ii nor rational is E. i and ii both conclusions are rational.