Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Who witnessed the demonstration of Fire Detection and Suppression System, FDSS developed by the DRDO for Passenger Buses at DRDO Bhawan in New Delhi in November 2020?

Who witnessed the demonstration of Fire Detection and Suppression System, FDSS developed by the DRDO for Passenger Buses at DRDO Bhawan in New Delhi in November 2020? Correct Answer Rajnath Singh

The correct answer is Rajnath Singh.

  • Defence Minister Rajnath Singh witnessed the demonstration of Fire Detection and Suppression System, FDSS developed by the DRDO for Passenger Buses at DRDO Bhawan in New Delhi on 9 November 2020.
  • The FDSS for passenger compartment comprises of a water tank of 80-litre capacity, and a 6.8-kg nitrogen cylinder pressurized to 200 bar installed at an appropriate location in the bus.
  • The FDSS for engine comprises of aerosol generator with which the fire suppression could be achieved within 5 seconds of the system activation. 

Related Questions

Consider the following statements regarding Fire Detection and Suppression System. 1. FDSS technology can detect fire in buses in less than 30 seconds and extinguish it in 60 seconds thereby reducing the risk to life and property to a significant extent. 2. It is developed by DRDO's Centre for Fire Explosive and Environment Safety (CFEES), Delhi. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused. Courses of action: I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years. II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad. III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All sacks are buses. Some sacks are bags. Only a few buses are car. Conclusions: I. All car can be Buses, II. All buses can be cars. III. Some bags are buses. 
Statements : All jungles are buses. All books are buses. All fruits are books.

Conclusions :
I. Some fruits are jungles.
II. Some buses are books.
III. Some buses are jungles.
IV. All fruits are buses.
As a result of a collision between two buses a passenger in one of the buses died. The accident occurred due to negligence of the drivers of both the buses. In a suit by the legal representative of the deceased against owners of both the buses, which one of the following statements is legally sustainable?
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh handed over how many DRDO developed products to the armed forces and other security agencies at an event held at DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi in December 2021?
In the following question two statements and some of their conclusions are given as alternatives. You have to consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions basically follows the given two statements irrespective of the commonly known facts. Statement: 1. Some pens are cats 2. All cats are buses Conclusions: A. All buses are cats B. Some buses are cats C. No bus is pen D. All buses are pens
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1. All cars are trucks 2. Some buses are cars. Conclusions: I. All cars are buses. II. Some buses are trucks. III. All trucks are buses.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which tof the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1. Some cars are buses. 2. Some buses are trucks 3. Some trucks are scooters Conclusions: I. Some cars are scooters. II. Some trucks are buses. III. Some scooters are buses. IV. All scooters are trucks.
Below four statements and three conclusions are given. You have to take the given statements to be true. Decide which of the given conclusions logically true from given statements. Statements: All roads are buses. Some buses are cars. Some cars are days. All days are nights. Conclusions: I. Some nights are buses. II. Some nights are cars. III. Some days are buses.