If 'Amit Shah' is called 'P. V. Narasimha Rao', 'P. V. Narasimha Rao' is called 'Narendra Modi', 'Narendra Modi' is called 'Ajit Doval', 'Ajit Doval' is called 'Sushma Swaraj', then Who is Prime Minister of India in 2020?

If 'Amit Shah' is called 'P. V. Narasimha Rao', 'P. V. Narasimha Rao' is called 'Narendra Modi', 'Narendra Modi' is called 'Ajit Doval', 'Ajit Doval' is called 'Sushma Swaraj', then Who is Prime Minister of India in 2020? Correct Answer Ajit Doval

The logic follows here is :-

Words Meaning
Amit Shah P. V. Narasimha Rao
P. V. Narasimha Rao Narendra Modi
Narendra Modi Ajit Doval
Ajit Doval Sushma Swaraj

 

The Prime Minister of India in 2020 is 'Narendra Modi'.

But,

Here 'Narendra Modi' is called 'Ajit Doval'.

Hence, Prime Minister of India in 2020 is 'Ajit Doval'.

Thus, the correct answer is 'Ajit Doval'.

Related Questions

A set of 4 sentences (A, B, C and D in the same order) have been given in the above question followed by five option choices. From the option choice provided look for the option choice that acts as the fifth sentence (conclusion) for the statements mentioned. A. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a letter to his new Pakistani counterpart Imran Khan has called for bilateral engagement, sources confirmed on Monday. B. In the first official communication with the new administration in Islamabad, the Indian leader has called for building on good neighbourly ties for security and prosperity in the region. C. The Indian response came soon after the newly appointed Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that Mr. Modi has indicated at dialogue in his letter. However, the official said that India has not called for dialogue so far. D. Prime Minister wrote of constructive approach or engagement for the benefit of the people, by which he meant Pakistan should create conducive atmosphere.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: A shortage of bank branches and ATMs across India’s hinterland is holding back Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s financial inclusion efforts and risks angering rural voters ahead of elections next year. After taking office in 2014, Modi set an ambitious target to open a bank account for every household to ensure welfare funds flow directly to India’s poor, while improving access to credit and insurance programs. He pushed policies that helped bring 310 million people into the formal banking system in just four years, according to the World Bank. Based on the arguments stated below and he information stated above, which of the following arguments state the reason for the problem, ‘But many of India’s villages still lack bank branches or ATMs to help service new customers, while the pace of building new financial infrastructure has actually slowed’.  Arguments: I. Because Modi’s government effectively forced poor citizens into the banking system by linking some welfare benefits to bank accounts, villagers have ended up stuck in long queues and struggling with ATMs that often run out of cash or break down.  II. With an election due next year, the mismatch between the government’s policies and the rural banking system is generating frustration among a key slice of India’s electorate. III. The banking system struggled to keep up, while some gains proved temporary. Nearly half of Indian bank accounts were inactive in 2017, meaning they weren’t used at all in the previous 12 months