Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Statements: No policy is war. Some war are trade. Some trade are act. All act are force. Conclusion: I. Some trade are force. II. No war is act. III. Some force are policy. IV. No policy are force.

Statements: No policy is war. Some war are trade. Some trade are act. All act are force. Conclusion: I. Some trade are force. II. No war is act. III. Some force are policy. IV. No policy are force. Correct Answer Only conclusion I and either III or IV follow.

The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows,

Conclusion:

I. Some trade are force → True (Some trade are act and all act are force so those trade who is act are also force)

II. No war is act → False (No direct relation given hence, false)

III. Some force are policy → False (No direct relation given hence, false)

IV. No policy are force → False (No direct relation given hence, false)

Conclusive III and IV form complementary pair.

Thus,Only conclusion I and Either III or IV follow.

Related Questions

In the question given below are given two statements followed by a few conclusions a option. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions basically follows from the tow given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: A. All rivers are clouds B. Some animals are rivers Conclusion: 1. Some rivers are animals 2. Some clouds are rivers 3. All clouds are rivers 4. All animals are clouds A. Conclusion 1 and 2 follow B. Conclusion 1, 2 and 3 follow C. Conclusion 1 and 3 follow D. Conclusion 2, 3 and 4 follow
In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusion, Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements, Statements: I. All pages are yellow. II. All yellow are newspapers. III. Some newspapers are national. Conclusions: I. Some national are yellow II. Some newspapers are pages. III. No page is national.
Consider two Statements and four Conclusions given below. You have to take the Statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the Statements, disregarding the commonly known facts. Statement - 1 : Some greens are blues. Statement - 2 Some blues are blacks. Conclusion - 1 : Some greens are blacks. Conclusion - 2 : No green is black. Conclusion - 3 : All greens are blacks. Conclusion - 4 : All blacks are greens. Which one of the following is correct ?
In the question, three statements are given, followed by four conclusions, I, II, III and IV. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All mosquitoes are hens. Statement II: No hen is pig. Statement III: No goat is hen. Conclusion I: Some hens are not mosquitoes. Conclusion II: Some goats are not hens. Conclusion III: Some pigs are not mosquitoes. Conclusion IV: Some goats are hens.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All chairs are pens. II. Some pens are cups. III. All cups are pencils.  Conclusion: I. Some pencils are pens. II. All pencils are chairs. III. All chairs are cups. 
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some statements followed by some conclusion. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All bats are balls Some ball are wickets. Conclusion: I. Some bats are wickets. II. All wickets are balls.
Two Statements followed by four Conclusions are given below. You have to take the Statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows/ follow from the Statements, disregarding the commonly known facts : Statement-1 : All pens are books. Statement-2 : No chair is a pen. Conclusion-I : All chairs are books. Conclusion-II : Some chairs are pens. Conclusion-III : All books are chairs. Conclusion-IV : No chair is a book. Which one of the following is correct?
Some statements and its two conclusions 1 and 2 are given. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Statement: All mangoes are golden colored. No golden thing is cheap. Conclusion: 1. All mangoes are cheap. 2. Golden colored mangoes are not cheap. Decide which of the following options given below logically follows the given statements. A. Both conclusions 1 and 2 follow. B. Neither conclusion 1 nor conclusion 2 follows. C. Only conclusion 1 follows D. Only conclusion 2 follows
In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All cotton is cloth. Statement II: All cotton is shirts. Statement III: Some cotton is woven. Conclusion I: Some woven is shirts. Conclusion II: Some cloth is woven. Conclusion III: All cloth is shirts.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The United States has launched what China calls the ‘largest trade war in economic history' and in its latest move targeted another $200 billion in Chinese export goods. The US-China spat is one of several trade fights picked by the protectionist President Donald Trump as his ‘America First' agenda disrupts trade relations among traditional allies. The growing share of international trade under threat has raised the prospect the escalating trade war could harm the global economy, shrinking investments and undermining supply chains. Why? Arguments: I. Several companies - including Total and Peugeot of France, and Russia's Lukoil - have said they are preparing to exit Iran ahead of US deadlines, the last of which is November 4. II. Trump argued the original deal from 2012 was lopsided in Seoul's favour but has also clouded the issue by appearing to link trade concessions to progress in his separate track of talks with nuclear-armed North Korea. III. Meanwhile, talks among the three NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) signatories, launched after Trump demanded an overhaul of the ‘terrible deal', have snagged notably owing to the US demands to increase American content installed in duty-free autos.